Thursday, April 5, 2007

More 9/11 Questions

Regarding the video that magically appeared last Fall showing the "alleged" 9/11 hijackers, several questions arise.

1. The original video was aired by the London Sunday Times, which is owned by Rupert Murdoch. Murdoch is a darling of the neocons and right-wing radicals in the Republican Party. The video itself was captured FIVE years ago.
So, how long has Murdoch sat on this tape? Isn't it a huge coincidence that the video surfaced the same weekend the Rep. Foley child pedophile scandal and Bob Woodward's newest book, "State of Denial" both hit the mainstream media?

2. About the tape itself: We're supposed to believe that 9/11, a huge logistical affair and an intelligence nightmare that was pulled off with military precision by the men on the tape, were astute and smart enough to be part of that operation, but were too dumb to know how to properly operate a video recorder so that voices would be recorded? Remember, these same guys were able to hijack several of the largest civilian airliners in the world and fly and operate them with ease, but they couldn't figure out how to make a video tape with sound?

So, which one is it? Are/were these guys the criminal masterminds everyone has been taught to believe or just a couple of dummies?
You can't have it both ways.

3. Why can't even State Department linguistics figure out what the men on the tape are saying? Something's rotten here and i hope to heck there are enough savvy journalists around to dig up the real story.

Again, anytime the truth gets out about the misdeeds and criminal behavior of the Bush/Cheney cabal, another piece of so-called "evidence" about 9/11 just manages to appear out of thin air.
Some might say that is being paranoid, i say it's just a good propaganda machine that the White House has built and maintained that does an excellent job of always changing the focus of real news into their perception of reality.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Please stick to the topic at hand. Anyone trying to hijack this blog with long, winding comments about other topics or spam will be booted.

Fair Use Notice

This web site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance the understanding of humanity's problems and hopefully to help find solutions for those problems. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. A click on a hyperlink is a request for information. Consistent with this notice you are welcome to make 'fair use' of anything you find on this web site. However, if you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. You can read more about 'fair use' and US Copyright Law at the Legal Information Institute of Cornell Law School. This notice was modified from a similar notice at Information Clearing House.

Blog Archive