Monday, February 9, 2009

Chinese skyscraper defies the Laws of Thermodynamics!!

A Tale of Two Buildings

Look at these photos of two skyscraper fires. One building is partially completed, and the fire and flames are licking at the exposed steel beams and girders.

The other building has a few fires here and there, but not near the amount of flames that the partially completed building does.

Which one of these buildings do you think collapsed in on its own footprint, at near free-fall speed and which one is still standing?

Here's the fire at the 47 story tall WTC 7 on 9/11:

And the Beijing, China fire at the 44 story Mandarin Oriental hotel on February 9, 2009.

Hey, N.I.S.T., what about that "thermal expansion" thing? Or does that NIST made law of physics only apply to the World Trade Center building 7 and was only valid for that day and that building alone?
NIST, I've come up with a new theory about your theory and this theory involves heated air and baloney, but I'll not use the actual term here, as I think you know what kind of heated baloney I'm talking about.

Fire rages at Beijing luxury hotel after fireworks

BEIJING – The burning shell of an unfinished, 44-story luxury hotel lit the night sky over downtown Beijing on Monday after being showered with sparks from fireworks set off during China's biggest holiday.
Flames surged up one side of the hotel and sent off huge plumes of black smoke, showering the ground with embers as police held back crowds of onlookers.


A. Peasant said...

Oh, Gawd, not the hot baloney stick!

kenny's sideshow said...

NIST just responded and has now declared that the laws of physics are indeed localized and vary from place to place.

Case closed, again.....

Saladin said...

No doubt if the buildings next door had been hit by jet airliners that Chinese skyscraper would have collapse in 7.5 seconds flat!

Whisleblower said...

Just passing by to say good work and to stress the fact that thermodynamics don't apply to Chinese skyscrapers when built with recycled steel from the WTC buildings unless of course they're hit by FAA 'deregistered' United Airlines jets like 93&175 carrying copies of the Koran and at least one smoking gun like a fireproof passport.

Greg Bacon said...

Or if China's version of the SEC had been in that building or an emergency command center that had directed the fireworks display, then the building might of fallen.

Fair Use Notice

This web site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance the understanding of humanity's problems and hopefully to help find solutions for those problems. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. A click on a hyperlink is a request for information. Consistent with this notice you are welcome to make 'fair use' of anything you find on this web site. However, if you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. You can read more about 'fair use' and US Copyright Law at the Legal Information Institute of Cornell Law School. This notice was modified from a similar notice at Information Clearing House.

Blog Archive