Monday, June 1, 2009

U Sank My Carrier!

He was given nothing but small planes and ships-fishing boats, patrol boats, that kind of thing. He kept them circling around the edges of the Persian Gulf aimlessly, driving the Navy crazy trying to keep track of them. When the Admirals finally lost patience and ordered all planes and ships to leave, van Ripen had them all attack at once. And they sank two-thirds of the US fleet.

When kids play war, they end up spending less time shooting than arguing: "You're dead!" "Am not! You missed!" It just gets worse the bigger the kids. I remember a D & D'er crying when his character got killed -- wouldn't talk to the rest of us for years, still grieving for his dead elf.

The US military has been having exactly this kind of argument, played out in the world press, since last August. They're even whinier and more of a pain about it than D&Ders, if you can believe that, with leaks and counter-leaks, planted stories, and plenty of good ol' character assassination.

It all comes out of the "Millenium Challenge '02" war games we staged in the Persian Gulf this summer. The big scandal was that the Opposing Force Commander, Gen. Paul van Ripen, quit mid-game because the games were rigged for the US forces to win. The scenario was a US invasion of an unnamed Persian Gulf country (either Iraq or Iran). The US was testing a new hi-tech joint force doctrine, so naturally van Riper used every lo-tech trick he could think of to mess things up. When the Americans jammed his CCC network , he sent messages by motorbike.

The truth is that van Ripen did something so important that I still can't believe the mainstream press hasn't made anything of it. With nothing more than a few "small boats and aircraft," van Ripen managed to sink most of the US fleet in the Persian Gulf.

What this means is as simple and plain as a skull: every US Navy battle group, every one of those big fancy aircraft carriers we love, won't last one single day in combat against a serious enemy.

2 comments:

  1. "The US Navy ... won't last one single day in combat against a serious enemy."

    meh, good!

    If they want to truly defend America and Americans, I'm all for 'em.

    If they want to be the JEWS mindless goons, conquering the whole planet just so kikes can rob everyone blind and inaugurate Hell, FUCK EM, I WANT them all to die.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Whaa?? No old carrier sailors around since last August to explain?

    1) Ships (ALL) are built to be sunk.

    2) Carriers too.

    3) ALL ships in international waters (carriers too) are considered EXPENDABLE.

    4) The decks of ALL US vessels (carriers too) are AMERICAN SOIL by law and naval tradition.

    5) Any ship sent anywhere in the world, therefore, is a floating chunk of the USA. Drop ONE BEANBAG on an American ship and...

    6) "Carrier groups are vulnerable", no kidding. The country isn't?

    7) Point of the aircraft carrier: Even mortally wounded and sinking they carry enough firepower to destroy the attacker. The AVERAGE American carrier is superior to all but 3 national nuclear powers on Earth.

    8) Given that -- Sure enough, Somebody could sink lots of US ships real fast. Somebody nuts.

    BUT TO ALL OF THE ABOVE LET ME ADD --

    The current American government is only too clearly trying to provoke a war with Iran. As early as four years ago carrier groups were scudding offshore trying to get the Mullahs to shoot.

    So the clear and present danger to US sailors, as usual, comes from lunatics in Washington. These madmen DO know what carriers are for, and they should NEVER be in a position to command them.

    ReplyDelete

Fair Use Notice

This web site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance the understanding of humanity's problems and hopefully to help find solutions for those problems. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. A click on a hyperlink is a request for information. Consistent with this notice you are welcome to make 'fair use' of anything you find on this web site. However, if you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. You can read more about 'fair use' and US Copyright Law at the Legal Information Institute of Cornell Law School. This notice was modified from a similar notice at Information Clearing House.

Blog Archive