Thursday, July 1, 2010

9/11: A Tale of 2 Buildings and Why Didn't the Most Damaged One Collapse?

From using that MOSSAD/CIA false-flag tragedy of 9/11 to now, we have let loose an unimaginable collection of horrors against the Muslim world. The war against Afghanistan keeps evolving, deliberately so, further dragging America into a bankrupt hole, morally and financially from which we will never emerge.
And that's the good part, as the Afghans are being subjected to a non-stop litany of abuse, murder and torture as we slowly rip their nation apart.

While we vent our frustrations and madness against the people of Afghanistan and Iraq, Somalia and Yemen, that Apartheid Nightmare AKA Israel continues on with it's planned ethnic cleansing campaign of murder and theft against the indigenous Palestinians, with the Zionist owned MSM playing up genocide like it was part of the 'War of Terror.'

Why did WTC 6 look like it had been destroyed by an interior explosion?


Can someone please explain how WTC 6, which NO airliner impacted, wound up being totally destroyed? Yet, it did not collapse and fall down into its own footprint, strange, no?
The 8-story WTC 6 lay between the North Tower and WTC 7. WTC 6 was evidently damaged before either tower fell and had an unexplained crater that went to the lowest basement level. The basement of the building appears to have experienced an explosion at the exact moment the South Tower collapsed. In this photo the rubble of the North Tower is on the left and the remains of WTC 7 are on the lower right.

The destruction of WTC 6 is one of the many unexplained questions of 9-11. This 8-story building suffered a huge crater in its center which went all the way down to sub-basement levels. What caused the huge crater in the middle of WTC 6?
I guess NIST was too busy concocting lies about how WTC 7 fell to take time and look into the mysterious destruction of WTC 6.

More photos and evidence available here:


Surely this isn't just another power and money grab by the world's leading authority in lies, theft, con games, murder and larceny?

Thus, the Big Lie begins
(8:50 a.m.) September 11, 2001: CIA Director Tenet Told of Attack, Immediately Suspects Bin Laden

CIA Director George Tenet is told of the first WTC crash while he is eating breakfast with his mentor, former Senator David Boren (D), at the St. Regis Hotel in Washington, DC. They are interrupted when CIA bodyguards converge on the table to hand Tenet a cell phone. Tenet is told that the WTC has been attacked by an airplane. Boren later says, “I was struck by the fact that [the messenger] used the word ‘attacked.’” Tenet then hands the cell phone back to an aide and says to Boren, “You know, this has bin Laden’s fingerprints all over it.” “‘He was very collected,’ Boren recalls. ‘He said he would be at the CIA in 15 minutes, what people he needed in the room and what he needed to talk about.’” [USA TODAY, 9/24/2001; ABC NEWS, 9/14/2002]
Before 9/11, the CIA demonstrated ignorance and lack of concern about 'Binjamin' Laden. Within 10 minutes of the first jet hitting the WTC, CIA Director George "It's a Slam Dunk, Mr. President" Tenant says 'Binjamin' Laden is behind 9/11.

1 comment:

  1. 一個人的價值,應該看他貢獻了什麼,而不是他取得了什麼.................................................................


Fair Use Notice

This web site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance the understanding of humanity's problems and hopefully to help find solutions for those problems. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. A click on a hyperlink is a request for information. Consistent with this notice you are welcome to make 'fair use' of anything you find on this web site. However, if you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. You can read more about 'fair use' and US Copyright Law at the Legal Information Institute of Cornell Law School. This notice was modified from a similar notice at Information Clearing House.

Blog Archive