Tuesday, January 4, 2011

9/11: CNN Pentagon Reporter Jamie McIntyre States that there's NO Evidence of Plane Wreckage

Just minutes after the alleged attack, standing in front of the Pentagon on September 11, 2001, Jamie McIntyre, CNN’s senior Pentagon correspondent since November 1992, reported: “From my close up inspection there’s no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the Pentagon. . . . . The only pieces left that you can see are small enough that you could pick up in your hand. There are no large tail sections, wing sections, fuselage — nothing like that anywhere around which would indicate that the entire plane crashed into the side of the Pentagon.”


Watch how Jamie McIntyre, CNN correspondant at the Pentagon, contradicts his statements as a witness at the Pentagon attack on 9-11, during an interview about the 'new' videos released.

9-11-2001
"There's no evidence of a plane crashing anywhere near the Pentagon..."

2006
"For anyone with any common sense and given all the other evidence we have, there's really no doubt that a plane hit the Pentagon..."





Only those who helped pull off this attack, like elements of the CIA; FBI and the White House, aided and abetted by Israeli terrorist ops like their blood-drenched MOSSAD, know WHAT REALLY HAPPENED on 9/11, but it sure as hell wasn't 19 Arabs, being directed from 12,000 miles away, by a man dying from kidney disease.

It wasn't a coincidence that around the same time the FALSE FLAG/INSIDE JOB OF 9/11 was pulled off by elements of the CIA; the FBI and White House, helped by Israeli terrorist outfits like their murderous MOSSAD, that those Zionist owned, Jewish run "Too Big to Fail" Wall Street banks went on a looting and plundering spree, stealing TRILLIONS from our pockets, much of which MADOFF to Israel.
Madoff was a past treasurer of the American Jewish Congress and in bed with corrupt pro-Israel financiers Sy Syms and Jacob Merkin.

Syms ran billions of dirty money through the Israeli Discount Bank of New York, while researcher Wayne Madsen wrote on January 14:

“Madoff is suspected of transferring much of his ill-gotten gain to Israeli banks, including one, Bank Leumi, that Madoff associate J. Ezra Merkin bought from the Israeli government when Ariel Sharon was prime minister and current PM Ehud Olmert was finance minister.”
WTFU America, before they come to steal the gold crowns on your teeth.

ZERO: An Investigation into 9/11, has one central thesis - that the official version of the events surrounding the attacks on 9/11 can not be true. This brand new feature documentary from Italian production company Telemaco explores the latest scientific evidence and reveals dramatic new witness testimony, which directly conflicts with the US Government's account.

Zero: An Investigation Into 9-11 - part 1



Zero : An Investigation Into 9-11- part 3



The alleged hijacker who were told was able to fly one of the world's largest and most complicated planes, a Boeing 757 into the Pentagon, couldn't learn to fly one of the world's smallest and simplest planes to learn to fly, a single-engine Cessna
Duncan Hastie, the school’s owner, finds [Hani] Hanjour a “weak student” who is “wasting our resources.” According to Hastie, “He was not able to fly solo in a small plane, which is equivalent to getting out of a parking space [in a car] and stopping.” Hanjour returns to CRM in December 1997 with two friends: Bandar Al Hazmi, a Saudi like Hanjour, and Rayed Abdullah of Qatar. (There apparently is no family relationship between Bandar Al Hazmi and the two Alhazmi 9/11 hijackers.) Hanjour takes about three lessons, but still fails to complete the coursework necessary for a license to fly a single-engine aircraft. Subsequently, he phones the school about twice per year requesting more lessons, but, according to Hastie, “We didn’t want him back at our school because he was not serious about becoming a good pilot.”
Flight Data Recorder Analysis - Last Second of Data - 09:37:44

We have determined based on the Flight Data Recorder information that has been analyzed thus far provided by the NTSB, that it is impossible for this aircraft to have struck down the light poles.
I find it hard to believe Capt. Burlingame gave up his ship to Hani Hanjour pointing a boxcutter at him. Pilots know The Common Strategy prior to 9/11. Capt. Burlingame would have taken them where they wanted to go, but only after seeing more than a "boxcutter" or knife. Why was Capt. Burlingame, a retired Military Officer with training in anti-terrorism, reported to have given up his airplane to 5 foot nothing. 100 and nothing Hani Hanjour holding a "boxcutter". (Exaggeration added for size of Hani, he was tiny, lets just put it that way). We at pilotsfor911truth.org feel the same as his family in that Capt. Burlingame would not have given up his airplane unlike what is reported in this linked article from CNN.
Pilots for 9/11 Truth

The screenshot shows the very last frame of the recorded data. It stops at 9:37:44 AM EDT (Official Impact Time is 09:37:45). You will notice in the right margin the altitude of the aircraft on the middle instrument. It shows 180 feet.

Pentagon_Flight77


Still Believe a 757 slammed into the Pentagon?

Photobucket

8 comments:

  1. I agree, there's no evidence of any plane wreckage, the hole in the Pentagon was just *too* precise (plus it doesn't fit!), there were too many people linked with the military/Boeing/airplanes (not too mention right wing pundit and wife of Bush's lawyer, Barbara Olson) on board that flight to be a coincidence (I seriously doubt they died at the crash scene) they won't release any decent footage of what has to be one of the most heavily monitored sites on the planet ... plus one of the <a href="http://911review.org/Wiki/PentagonAttackWitnessesBlast.shtml>witnesses</a> who says he saw a 757 turns out to be Bobby Eberle of GOPUSA, who you might remember to be Jeff Gannon's boss (remember the phony white house reporter who later turned out to be a male prostitute?).

    It really bugs me that so many people think the "no-planers" are disinfo people (Mike Rivero, for one). I mean, where's the proof? Where's the plane???

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks for the intelligent comments.

    As for 'Mikey' Rivero, there's something funny going on at WRH.

    Here's a guy that lives in one of the world's most expensive places to reside, Hawaii, yet claims his real job is 2,400 miles away, in Hollywood?

    If 'Mikey' was a real threat to Zionism and Apartheid Israel in exposing the REAL perps behind 9/11, I don't think that cushy Hollywood job would still be employing 'Mikey.'

    Plus, he brooks no alternative thoughts, ideas or even stories from legit online sites that show it was impossible for a Boeing 757 to hit the Pentagon at that opening, unless it had dug a 5 foot deep, 1/4 mile long trench.

    Something's not adding up in the 'Aloha State.'

    ReplyDelete
  3. P.S. Did a Boeing 757 fly OVER the Pentagon at the same time the missile or hybrid model UAV, painted to look like a 757, hit the Pentagon?

    Most likely and who would notice the Boeing flying away, since their attention would be focused on the massive explosion and fireball?

    ReplyDelete
  4. It's funny you posted this Greg because yesterday I spent some time looking at sites with the supposedly first photos taken after the Pentagon attack before the wall collapse. No sign of a 757 in any of them.

    As for Mikey, I have never understood his stance on this. Afraid that the gov will one day release 'real' videos of the plane hitting and discredit the entire truth movement? It's weak speculation and I don't buy it.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Being on the far side of the building I didn't see a fireball but
    only black smoke AND a full-size jet
    trying to make a U-turn,or some such
    maneuver.I remember thinking that it
    must have come from a funny direction to be facing the way it was. A guy I was with thought the plane might stall because of it's awkward position. I lost track of it then as we were ordered to evacuate; the 4th plane was still believed to be headed toward the federal zone where we were.Directly across the river from the P-gon we
    were shook so bad I thought a bus had hit my office/trailer! We always
    knew it was explosives because of the sound it made but assumed those "..19 arabs" brought it.
    Carry-on.

    ReplyDelete
  6. its the youtube video for 4/2/15..I'm going to wipe his______ in the wreckage of the crusise midssile that hit it
    he won't discuss Chemtrails or the Pentagon & the 757 that never hit it & can only name call? wtf?Rivero IS a atheist,so what does he care about lying for a big NASA or Juice Zionist paycheck each week.. IS NAME CALLING THE BEST MR RIVERO CAN DO?..Mike is much to smart to not know a 757 didn't hit the Pentardgon..something stinks & i thinks its a rotten pineapple in the WRH radio show trashcan..we want to know WHAT REALLY HAPPENED AT THE PENTAGON ON 9-11 ALL RIGHT and WRH sure as L ain't the place to find out!

    ReplyDelete
  7. the YouTube video by Ron Gibson for the WRH radio show for 4/2/15..I really lay out why a 757 could never have hit the Pentagon..its scientifically impossible for large jets to get anywhere near ground level going 520 MPH..too much pressure builds up under the jet...no jets at the WTC towers in NYC either..no planes in NYC or the Pentagon says John Lear Jr. whos father built the Lear jet..he knows a thing or 2 about jets too,& he says there isn't a chance in L jets crashed into any of the buildings on 9-11..Jim Fetzer had him on his Dynamic duo GCN show a couple times....

    ReplyDelete
  8. the comment section for the Ron Gibson WRH radio show with no commercials is where i lay out all the facts about chemtrail/geo-engineering & the Pentagon missileyou have 2 commercial or large cargo aircraft AT THE SAME ALTITUDE..one leves a chemtrail & the othr leaves a normal "contrail" where the water vapor dissappates in 5 seconds..tell us great one.. Mike Rivero.. why this is? we'll wait offline for your answer
    YOU'RE A CHEMTARD! you're POISONING THE WELL..YOU ARE NOT BELEEEEEVING ME WHEN I TELL YOU CHEMTRAILS ARE A HOAX! CLICK! 7 don't call in again! & bring up such foolishness..just because these chemtrails are burning the bark off the trees & everything else in CA. means NOTHING! the chemtrails have hazed the skies in the US by some 30%! the sky is no where near as blue as it should be & if it was ,they'd quickly turn the sky into a white have by their spraying..you can'y believe the $$$$ they are paying these chemtrail pilots..i heard 60 grand per day,but WTF does it matter? the money is all phony digits or paper debt notes made from thin air by banks & FED to infinity

    ReplyDelete

Fair Use Notice

This web site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance the understanding of humanity's problems and hopefully to help find solutions for those problems. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. A click on a hyperlink is a request for information. Consistent with this notice you are welcome to make 'fair use' of anything you find on this web site. However, if you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. You can read more about 'fair use' and US Copyright Law at the Legal Information Institute of Cornell Law School. This notice was modified from a similar notice at Information Clearing House.

Blog Archive