Friday, January 14, 2011

WHAT REALLY HAPPENED to the Pentagon on 9/11?

Lt. Robert Medairos, "First Incident Commander at the Scene" declared: "My first thought was I couldn't believe what happened and they said it was a plane and I didn't see any pieces of any plane and I couldn't believe that a plane hit the building."

9/11 stealth:First Witness on the scene, Lieutenant Robert Medairos: Didn't Sew Any "Plane" Pieces ABC 15.25 9/13

The 9/11 Commission goes with the plane story and a majority of those on that panel now say they were lied to by the WH; the WH stalled on requested documents; the docs they received were so redacted as to be worthless and witnesses they wanted to testify were declared VERBOTEN by the Bush Administration and the ones the Bush WH did allow to appear were intimidated by the FBI escorts.
The 9/11 Commission Rejects own Report as Based on Government Lies

In John Farmer’s book: “The Ground Truth: The Story Behind America’s Defense on 9/11″, the author builds the inescapably convincing case that the official version... is almost entirely untrue...

The 9/11 Commission now tells us that the official version of 9/11 was based on false testimony and documents and is almost entirely untrue. The details of this massive cover-up are carefully outlined in a book by John Farmer, who was the Senior Counsel for the 9/11 Commission.

Farmer, Dean of Rutger Universities' School of Law and former Attorney General of New Jersey, was responsible for drafting the original flawed 9/11 report.

In 2006, The Washington Post reported... "Suspicion of wrongdoing ran so deep that the 10-member commission, in a secret meeting at the end of its tenure in summer 2004, debated referring the matter to the Justice Department for criminal investigation, according to several commission sources. Staff members and some commissioners thought that e-mails and other evidence provided enough probable cause to believe that military and aviation officials violated the law by making false statements to Congress and to the commission..."
Decide for yourself. Don't let those seeking to obscure the REAL TRUTH intimidate you by calling you 'pod people,' or "Kool-Aid' drinkers.

The ones pushing the official lies from the "9/11 Commission" are the ones obstructing the Truth Seekers.

The ones that stand in the way of the search for 9/11 TRUTH are the ones who are suspect, not the ones seeking truth.

A Boeing 757, weighing around 100 TONS (200,000 POUNDS) we're told crashed into the Pentagon and all that's left is this puny piece of twisted metal?

"There was a dearth of visible debris on the relatively unmarked [Pentagon] lawn, where I stood only minutes after the impact. Beyond this strange absence of airliner debris, there was no sign of the kind of damage to the Pentagon structure one would expect from the impact of a large airliner. This visible evidence or lack thereof may also have been apparent to the secretary of defense [Donald Rumsfeld], who in an unfortunate slip of the tongue referred to the aircraft that slammed into the Pentagon as a "missile". ...

I saw nothing of significance at the point of impact - no airplane metal or cargo debris was blowing on the lawn in front of the damaged building as smoke billowed from within the Pentagon. ... all of us staring at the Pentagon that morning were indeed looking for such debris, but what we expected to see was not evident."
Lt. Col. Karen U. Kwiatkowski, PhD, U.S. Air Force (ret)

9:38. Arlington, Virginia. Hani Hanjour allegedly executes a 330-degree turn at 530 miles per hour, descending 7000 feet in two and a half minutes to crash American Airlines Flight 77 into the ground floor of the Pentagon.

"The MOSSAD Flying Aerial Circus is Proud to Introduce One of Our Most Precious Assets, Hani Hanjour!"
In late 1996, hijacker Hani Hanjour attends CRM Airline Training Center in Scottsdale, Arizona for three months. This is normally adequate time to earn a private pilot’s certificate, but Hanjour fails to accomplish this. [Los Angeles Times, 9/27/2001] Duncan Hastie, the school’s owner, finds Hanjour a “weak student” who is “wasting our resources.” According to Hastie, “He was not able to fly solo in a small plane, which is equivalent to getting out of a parking space [in a car] and stopping.”

At the next flight school Hanjour will attend in early 2001, the staff will be so appalled at his lack of skills that they will repeatedly contact the FAA and ask them to investigate how he got a pilot’s license. After 9/11, the FBI will appear to investigate how Hanjour got his license and question and polygraph the instructor who signed off on his flying skills. The Washington Post will note that, since Hanjour’s pilot skills were so bad, the issue of how he was able to get a license “remains a lingering question that FAA officials refuse to discuss.”
Hani couldn't even learn how to fly one of the world's easiest planes, a single-engine Cessna, yet we're supposed to believe he could handle one of the world's largest and most sophisticated planes, the 757?

"[Flight 77] could not possibly have flown at those speeds which they said it did without going into a high speed stall."

"The airplane won't go that fast when you start pulling those high G maneuvers. That plane would have fallen out of the sky..."

Russ Wittenburg, commercial and Air Force Pilot who has experience flying the Boeing 757
On November 22nd, 2004, a private jet on route to Houston to pick up George Bush, Senior clipped a single light pole and crashed a minute away from landing at Houston's Hobby Airport. The wing ripped off upon impact, scattering debris over a hundred yards. And yet, Flight 77 managed to tear five light poles completely out of the ground, without damaging either the wings or the light poles themselves. Instead, they seemed to have just popped out of the ground.
Simulator Recreation Demonstrates Pentagon Attack Impossibility

Pilots For 9/11 Truth Co-Founder Rob Balsamo along with Core Members Captain Rusty Aimer and Dwain Deets were recently invited by Gov. Jesse Ventura to discuss and attempt to recreate the attack on the Pentagon for the lastest investigation into the events of September 11, 2001. Unlike outdated simulator recreations offered by others, this attempt is based on the actual data being provided through the Freedom Of Information Act.

A 757 has two engines made of steel and titanium alloy which are nine feet in diameter twelve feet long and weight six tons each.


Titanium is one of the hardest metals known and has been used to build the world's deepest-diving submarines.

What happened to that 200,000 POUNDS of Boeing 757 debris from Flight 77?

Did another Shanksville, PA 'miracle' occur where the government claims the ground 'liquified' and swallowed Flight 93?
Nena Lensbour, who had prepared lunch for the workers at the scrap yard overlooking the crash site, was also one of the first people to view the smoking crater. She told AFP that the hole was five to six feet deep and smaller than the 24-foot trailer in her front yard. She described hearing an explosion, like an atomic bomb, not a crash.
Ultra-rare news footage from the crash site of United Flight 93 which has never been seen again since 9/11

She said she called 911 and stayed on the line as she ran across the reclaimed land of the former strip mine to within 15 feet of the smoking crater. She said that she did not see any evidence of a plane then or at anytime during the excavation at the site.
The Five-Sided Fantasy Island: An analysis of the Pentagon explosion on 9-11(3/12/2004)

Earliest reports from the Pentagon indicated that a helicopter explosion or attack took place.
But no tangible, verifiable evidence of an airliner crash at the Pentagon has ever been produced. Our analysis indicates that in reality, sophisticated shaped-charge explosive technology was used to create a scene comporting with the appearance of an jetliner crash, while simultaneously a 757 overflew the area and landed at nearby Reagan National Airport. If this scenario is correct, it shows that US intelligence agencies have developed an extraordinary capability to create elaborate magic shows on the world stage, generate false testimony and false evidence, and control and manipulate not only the "official story" but also its dialectical opposition among the critics.

Meanwhile, other reporters were out gathering eyewitness testimony, and found that many people saw a Boeing aircraft approaching the Pentagon on a flight path over Arlington Cemetery or its Naval Annex. However, initial reports from individuals very close to the crash were strange: they spoke of "a shrill noise", an "airplane which seemed to be able to hold eight or twelve persons", "something that made the sound of a missile", "like a cruise missile with wings" . It was difficult to find reports of anyone who clearly stated that they saw a Boeing aircraft in the moment of striking the Pentagon.


  1. Where the hell is Farmer? He should be all over the web (and hopefully TV). Why is this the ONLY time I have even read that he wrote a book?

  2. Nice little jab at you know who.

  3. I'm with you. The part of the Pentagon that was destroyed was very specific ... it had recently been "renovated" and was mostly empty (I recently heard they were storing financial records there, as well). If it were an actual plane hitting the Pentagon, wouldn't they want to do the most damage (regarding human casualties) as possible? Wouldn't it have been easier to "dive bomb" it from above?

    I don't understand why so many people at 911blogger disparage those that think a missile (or explosives) hit the Pentagon. What would be their motive for vehemently attacking people with that view? All I can think of is that if you weren't using a controlled missile or explosive, that exonerates the Pentagon itself, and everybody working there.

  4. I have to give Rivero credit for being one of a small handfull of bloggers that dares to place the blame for 9/11 squarely on Mossad shoulders, not many have the guts to do that. He has his quirks but overall I think he has been very helpful to our cause. To me what exactly happened is not nearly as important as who caused it.

  5. No doubt WRH is a great site and very informative and yes we're all quirky in ways. It's the being so adamant about one aspect of the story that's funny. Some of us just prefer to ask questions and believe there's nothing wrong with saying "I don't know."

  6. We can agree to disagree about what hit the Pentagon, but there's no need to call people names who don't agree with your viewpoint, that serves no purpose and puts us at odds with one another... 'divide and conquer' anyone?

    But I'm guessing that no one who's done any serious research about Flight 77 would agree with the 9/11 'Omission Commission.'

  7. I think it was a device that none
    of us have ever seen or heard of.
    Maybe a new delivery system also.
    Whenever I hear the phrase "no debris,no wreckage,only a hole" I
    wonder about the new DIME technology.
    Are people here familiar with this?
    It was used during CastLead
    and had many doctors puzzled. It was designed to be anti-personnel but could be adapted to other uses.
    It leaves nothing! Makes big splash!


Please stick to the topic at hand. Anyone trying to hijack this blog with long, winding comments about other topics or spam will be booted.

Fair Use Notice

This web site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance the understanding of humanity's problems and hopefully to help find solutions for those problems. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. A click on a hyperlink is a request for information. Consistent with this notice you are welcome to make 'fair use' of anything you find on this web site. However, if you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. You can read more about 'fair use' and US Copyright Law at the Legal Information Institute of Cornell Law School. This notice was modified from a similar notice at Information Clearing House.

Blog Archive