Wednesday, May 4, 2011

9/11: Comparing the Pyroclastic Flows from the Mt. St. Helens Explosion and the WTC Explosions

A pyroclastic flow, also known scientifically as a pyroclastic density current is a fast-moving current of extremely hot gas (which can reach temperatures of about 1,000 °C (1,830 °F) and rock, which travel away from a volcano at speeds generally as great as 700 km/h (450 mph).
Photo of one of WTC Towers imploding due to an explosion


Video of the explosions that wracked and tore apart Mt. Saint Helens volcano.

A photo of a Mayan volcano gone active:


Another photo of the dust clouds that enveloped Manhattan:


And another:


Notice how the sickly looking grayish smoke is evident at both Mt. Saint Helens/Mayan Volcano and at 'Ground Zero' and how the WTC dust clouds spread out like the dust clouds from the Mt. Saint Helens blast?
Guess that makes sense, since both Mt. Saint Helens and the WTC Twins were destroyed by explosions from within.

Let's see, weren't we told that the jet fuel had reached an unbelievable temperature in the 'Twins' of 1,800 degrees, causing the steel to melt?

And a pyroclastic flow from a volcano can reach over 1,830 degrees?

The WTC explosions were so violent, that people nearby were lifted off their feet and tossed dozens of feet away:
There are reports of people being picked up and carried distances by the South Tower dust cloud, which felt solid. New York Daily News photographer David Handschuh recalled:
Instinctively I lifted the camera up, and something took over that probably saved my life. And that was [an urge] to run rather than take pictures. I got down to the end of the block and turned the corner when a wave-- a hot, solid, black wave of heat threw me down the block. It literally picked me up off my feet and I wound up about a block away.
A building collapsing on its own weight doesn't generate that kind of energy, but one that was brought down with explosives would.

Around Mt. Saint Helens, tens of thousands of tons of melted rock, blasted granite and limestone had been pulverized into dust, just like the thousands of tons of reinforced concrete at the WTC that had been melted and pulverized into dust.

9/11 FDNY Chief of Safety, Albert Turi Describes Bombs And Secondary Explosions Killing Responders

One of the secondary devices he thinks that took place after the initial impact he thinks may have been on the plane that crashed into one of the towers. The second device - he thinks, he speculates - was probably planted in the building. ... But the bottom line is that he, Albert Turi, said that he probably lost a great many men in those secondary explosions, and he said that there were literally hundreds, if not thousands, of people in those towers when the explosions took place." Rudolph Guiliani said in a press confrence shortly after the buildings fell that the gas was turned off to that part of the city.


  1. I believe the comparison is very apt. The looks, the sounds, the action are basically the same.

    I found the video about Turi's comments fascinating. I've seen this interview somewhere before (Maybe Core of Corruption) which I plan to show at my place.

    In the Turi video, it didn't escape me that the reporter immediately started talking about the War on Terror.

    Frame the storyline.

    But they screwed up. Since I believe that things were so wild that day, even the storyline was not fully developed. It seems that initially they were going to suggest that the "terrorists" planted secondary bombs.

    But then the story changed to ONLY jets causing the destruction.

    I don't understand "why" this happened. But it seems it did.

    This is where the official story went haywire.

    But I said almost immediately (on that day) that "there is no way those jets caused those buildings to fall".

    I didn't understand all the details, but I knew in my heart by noon that day that this was a demo.

    Good work (and thanks, again, Greg).

  2. But they screwed up. Since I believe that things were so wild that day, even the storyline was not fully developed.

    Just like the OBL 'death' story that wasn't fully developed, they have been changing manufactured facts to fit the narrative.

    "OBL was armed and we shot him in a firefight... No, wait, he wasn't armed and we shot him on sight... We also killed his wife..No wait, we killed someone else's wife.. We killed one of his son's.. Uhhm scratch that, we didn't."

    "OBL was shot in the left eye... Oops, actually we shot in the right eye... Nooo, looks like we shot him in the forehead."

    Lies are tricky things to hold together.


Please stick to the topic at hand. Anyone trying to hijack this blog with long, winding comments about other topics or spam will be booted.

Fair Use Notice

This web site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance the understanding of humanity's problems and hopefully to help find solutions for those problems. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. A click on a hyperlink is a request for information. Consistent with this notice you are welcome to make 'fair use' of anything you find on this web site. However, if you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. You can read more about 'fair use' and US Copyright Law at the Legal Information Institute of Cornell Law School. This notice was modified from a similar notice at Information Clearing House.

Blog Archive