Here's a pic of a crashed Turkish Airlines passenger jet that wrecked while trying to land.
Finally a pic of Rwandair Flight 205 hitting a building:
Now the infamous pic of the Boeing 757 that we're told crashed into the Pentagon on 9/11.
NO ONE knows WHAT REALLY HAPPENED at the Pentagon on 9/11 except the back-stabbing Israeli Zionists and the traitorous American NeoCON scum that pulled off that FALSE FLAG/INSIDE JOB.
Although I'm no self-styled expert on everything under the sun, I do have a construction background in pouring concrete and later on, I eventually became a union bricklayer for awhile before working 20+ years as a career firefighter for a Midwestern FD, so I've got a little experience in matters concerning building construction and what happens to the same during fires.
This you can take to the bank: There's no way in Hell an aluminum-skinned passenger jet that has an aluminum airframe created that initial punch-out blast hole in the Pentagon, and went thru SIX WALLS for a total of NINE FEET OF HEAVILY REINFORCED CONCRETE, concrete that was reinforced even more after the OKC bombing, since the Feds figured the Pentagon could be a target.
No way, No how a Boeing 757 created that damage at the Pentagon on 9/11.
Until we take back our country from the murderous fucks that completely hijacked our nation on 9/11, indict, arrest, try and after they're found guilty, have some of them 'Dance on Air,' until then, we won't know WHAT REALLY HAPPENED at the Pentagon on 9/11.
The argument posed by some is that the Boeing disintegrated (variation: "vaporized") when it hit the Pentagon. However, there was a big hole in the Pentagon, so SOMETHING must have caused that hole, as big 16-foot holes don't appear in concrete by themselves.Source
Do you like math? If so, there's a basic calculation for what would have happened to the Boeing if it did indeed descend, as the official story holds, upon the Pentagon and crashed right into it. Ever heard of "G" force? The g-force of an object is its acceleration relative to free-fall. (Wikipedia) If you do the math, using the officially "professed" speed of the Boeing, its mass, its location, and the way it turned ... the effect of G force(s) would have yielded a virtual weight of about 8.5 million pounds for Flight 77, which alone would have caused it to disintegrate BEFORE striking the Pentagon.
So what made that hole?? Here's the math on the "crash" ...-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
With a virtual weight of about 8.5 million pounds, Flight 77 could not have levelled off before striking the Pentagon. It would have crashed before it reached the Pentagon.
This single fact is sufficient to refute the official account of "Flight 77."
Neither Hani Hanjour -- the alleged pilot trainee "noted for incompetence", nor the Boeing 757, would have been in any condition to fly with "the top of the fuselage of the aircraft no more than 20 ft above the ground" (Pentagon Building Performance Report, p14).
Pilots for 9/11 Truth did another calculation by lowering the height of "Flight 77" below that shown by the FDR. They lowered it to to the top of the Virginia Department of Transportation communications antenna that sits below the alleged flight path.
With this very conservative case, they calculated the force on the Boeing 757 at 11.2 Gs. "11.2 Gs was never recorded in the FDR. 11.2 Gs would rip the aircraft apart" they state.
What hard evidence has the government released to support its position? If you have that evidence, we'd like to see it.
Scientific, and other evidence, reinforce the conclusion: the official account of Flight 77 is false.