Wednesday, December 21, 2011

Why did the 9/11 Commission Refuse to Listen to NYFD Firefighters Who Were at the WTC Scene?

"If you tell a big enough Lie, and keep on repeating it, in the end people will come to believe it."

Josef Goebbels, Hitler's propaganda chief

9/11 Helicopter Pilot Eyewitness - We Saw Some Kind Of Explosion .... Then The Tower Collapsed


NYFD 9/11 witnesses

NYFD Asst. Commissioner Stephen Gregory: I thought that I saw...low level flashes...I saw flash-flash-flash, and then it looked like the building came down. You know like when they blow up a building, when it falls down? That's what I thought I saw."

Firefighter Daniel Rivera: "At first I thought it was... Do you ever see professional demolition where they set the charges on certain floors and then you hear, 'pop-pop-pop-pop-pop'? That's exactly what, because I thought it was that, when I heard that frigging noise, that's when I saw the building coming down."

NYFD Captain Karin Deshore: "Somewhere around the middle of the World Trade Center there was this orange and red flash coming out. Initially it was just one flash. Then this flash kept popping, all the way around the building, and that building had started to explode."

The New York City Fire Department, under the direction of Fire Commissioner Tom Von Essen, collected the testimony of 503 first-responder EMTs, Port Authority police, and firefighters. It came to 12,000 pages. The 9/11 Commission, run by White House appointee and insider, Philip Zelikow, rejected the testimony, just ignored it, not germane to the foregone conclusion.


9/11 COMMISSION REFUSES TO HEAR TESTIMONY OF 503 FIRST-RESPONDER EYEWITNESSES

Within a month of 9/11, NYC fire commissioner Thomas Von Essen, a 30-year NYFD vet, set up interviews with fire, port authority police and EMT first responders, getting their initial impressions of what they experienced on Sept 11. The stories of 503 men and women is 12,000 pages, the most comprehensive on-the-scene report of what happened that day. Graeme MacQueen, a recently retired religious studies professor, read all 12,000 pages. In addition to the heartrending nature of many of the stories, the consistent theme was of hearing, feeling and seeing explosions, a controlled demolition. Failure to officially acknowledge this evidence is further proof of an inside job by government, and complicity in the coverup by the media. MacQueen, a Buddhist scholar (McMaster University, Ontario, Canada), narrowed down the testimony of 118 interviews as especially court-worthy testimony. But he notes the entire testimony was excluded by the 9/11 Commission. Nor did the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) consider controlled demolition as a hypothesis for the obliteration of the WTC buildings.
Josef Goebbels Must Be Beaming With Pride
Immediately after the attacks, the Federal Bureau of Investigation started PENTTBOM, the largest criminal inquiry in the history of the United States. At its height, more than half of the FBI's agents worked on the investigation and followed a half-million leads.
Followed 500,000 leads? But not the testimony of the brave men and women of the NYFD that were on the scene, risking their lives, and 343 losing their lives during this FALSE FLAG/INSIDE JOB.

While 'Junior' was in Omaha, Nebraska, meeting with billionaires and 'Darth' Cheney was in an underground bunker, directing the attacks, the courageous NYFD firefighters were on the scene, yet the 9/11 Commission refused to listen to their accounts of hearing bombs going off during the WTC attacks.

Why would the TRUTH be excluded? Or would that have fucked up the Neocons and Zionists long ago plan to attack the USA and blame it on the Muslim world?

Patriots Question 9/11 - Responsible Criticism of the 9/11 Commission Report

Fire Fighters For 9-11 Truth

Ask yourself this: Who would you rather believe, the NYFD firefighters that were at the WTC and saw and heard the secondary explosions or our corrupt government?

Also ask yourself this: When was the last time the government told the truth about anything?


Don't believe your lying eyes, the 'official' government version of the WTC attacks claim this did not happen.

WTC_12.21.11

"As of 21 days after the attack, the fires were still burning and molten steel was still running"

Leslie Robertson, the Chief Structural Engineer for the WTC
Editor of Fire Engineering Magazine Bill Manning Condemns the "Half-Baked Farce"

Manning indicated that the destruction of the steel was illegal, based on his review of the national standard for fire investigation, NFPA 921, which provides no exemption to the requirement that evidence be saved in cases of fires in buildings over 10 stories tall.;;;[the investigation] is a half-baked farce that may already have been commandeered by political forces whose primary interests, to put it mildly, lie far afield of full disclosure.
Muslims Suspend Laws of Physics!
Remember that Israel, not the Muslim world, is benefiting from the events of 9-11. Certainly Israel has the gall to attack America. Remember the USS Liberty! http://www.USSLiberty.com . Israel, not a man living in a cave, had the technical sophistication to pull off the job. Israel, not bin Laden, had the contacts within the US Air Force to make sure the military organization that guards American skies (NORAD) was not around on September 11.
9/11 was a FALSE FLAG/INSIDE JOB pulled off by the WH; the FBI, the CIA and the Pentagon... and ISRAEL.

If you haven't figured that out by now, you're either part of that treachery, a paid dupe, a Zionist or so brainwashed that you should stick to watching NASCAR and American Idol.

The USA is no longer a free nation, but a police state ruled by thugs, thieves and murderers that had no problem spending $40 MILLION Dollars investigating whether or not 'Slick Willy' got a WH blow-job, but only spent $15 million investigating the largest mass-murder in American history.
Committees to investigate Pearl Harbor, Kennedy's assassination, the Challenger disaster, were all formed within one week of the event. And yet Cheney and Bush fought hard to not investigate the events of 9/11 for more than a year. Why?
If you don't believe the '9/11 Omission Commission,' or have begun to doubt what they have said, you're on the road to freedom.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

2 comments:

Jody Paulson said...

Bill Manning's editorial was one of the first implications I had that the official 9-11 story was a lie. When these guys commit major crimes (such as the murder of JFK) the most blatant evidence you see are their attempts to cover it up. Meanwhile, the head of the 9-11 commission, Thomas Kean, can't get his story straight about how building 7 fell and Donald Rumsfield doesn't even know what building 7 *is*.

Greg Bacon said...

Thomas Kean, can't get his story straight

That's what usually happens when someone tells a lie. It's so dang hard remembering the original lie and if asked now the same question asked seven or eight years ago, the original lie is like the guy who went fishing and lost the 'Big One.' Each time he retells the Battle Royal fighting the fish, the fish gets bigger.

And this 9/11 fish lie is not only getting bigger, it's turning putrid from hanging around so long.

Fair Use Notice

This web site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance the understanding of humanity's problems and hopefully to help find solutions for those problems. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. A click on a hyperlink is a request for information. Consistent with this notice you are welcome to make 'fair use' of anything you find on this web site. However, if you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. You can read more about 'fair use' and US Copyright Law at the Legal Information Institute of Cornell Law School. This notice was modified from a similar notice at Information Clearing House.

Blog Archive