Sunday, June 10, 2012

Look at these photos of the USS Liberty and Cole and ask yourself this:

Compare these photos of the damage done to the Liberty and Cole and ask yourself, why are they so similar? Was the same type of shaped charges and knowledge of where to hit the ships from the same source?

USS Liberty

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

In the USS Liberty affair, the father of US former presidential candidate John McCain led what some might call an 'investigation", the Naval Court of Inquiry, but what others would call a "whitewash" to help cover up the fact that combined elements of the IDF savagely and brutally attacked the Liberty, killing 34 US personnel and wounding 174.

The Israeli forces attacked the Liberty with full knowledge that this was an American ship.

USS Cole

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

In the USS Cole affair, FBI agent John O'Neill led the investigation and was getting background and info on the true attackers of the Cole when he was recalled to DC to never return to Yemen. US Ambassador to Yemen, Barbara Bodine, was the main roadblock to O'Neill's investigation.

Why was the Cole sent to Yemen to refuel? Refueling is normally done at sea, so why send a US ship alone, to Yemen for refueling?

Was the upcoming 2000 US presidential election a factor?

Was a "false-flag" needed to help all but guarantee that the Bush/Cheney Junta win the election? And was that "false-flag" the October 2000 attack on the Cole?

Some sources, like the NYT, issued hit pieces on O'Neil, while others, praised him for his tireless efforts in investigating the Cole attack.
However, upon arriving in Yemen, he complained about inadequate security. As his team investigated, O'Neill came into conflict with Barbara Bodine, the U.S. ambassador to Yemen. The two had widely divergent views on how to handle searches of Yemeni property and interviews with citizens and government officials, and they only grew further apart as time progressed.

After a month in Yemen, O'Neill returned to New York 20 pounds (9 kg) lighter than when he left. He hoped to return to that country to continue the investigation, but was blocked by Bodine and others. He continued to investigate the Cole bombing, but eventually decided that the FBI investigation in Yemen must be pulled out due to inadequate security.
A New York Times report of August 19, 2001 suggested that O'Neill had been the subject of an "internal investigation" at the FBI.

But others praised John's work in Yemen:
But John gained the respect, and he was on the ground over there for a substantial period of time.
He gained the respect gradually of the president of the highest government officials over there, and we've seen the fruits of those relationships -- and we still are.
Did John suspect Israeli involvement in the USS Cole bombing? That seems to be the case, as the US ambassador to Yemen, Bodine, appealed to Secretary of State Albright to deny O'Neill's return to Yemen to continue the investigation.

Bodine wanted O'Neill to drop his bodyguards and he became suspicious of Mossad assassination. Bodine and Madeleine Albright finally went to the FBI Director, Louis Freeh, to remove John O'Neill from Yemen.

O'Neill retired from the FBI in August 2001 and took a job with the WTC in New York. He was appointed by Kroll Associates, namely by the controversial managing director Jerome Hauer.

"Lucky" Larry Silverstein, who took control of the WTC the first of September, insists that O'Neill start work in the WTC no later than the first week of September. On 9/11, although he has a meeting scheduled on the 88th floor of the North Tower, "Lucky" Larry is late for that meeting and miraculously isn't in the WTC when the attacks commence.

"Lucky" Larry and Jerome Hauer, Zionist Birds of a Feather?

Who is Jerome Hauer?
Jerome Hauer's deep family roots in the New York Jewish community. Hauer's mother, Rose Muscatine Hauer, is the retired Dean of the Beth Israel School of Nursing and the Honorary President of the New York Chapter of Hadassah, the Daughters of Zion movement that is one of the central Zionist organizations involved in the creation and maintenance of the State of Israel.

Jerome Hauer is the son of the late Milton G. Hauer and Rose Muscatine who married April 4, 1949. His mother's parents, Hyman David Muscatine (1881-1964) and Rebecca Bertha (nee Gartner), were Hebrew-speaking Zionists. They both came to the United States in 1908-1909; Hyman from "Russia Poland" in 1908 and Rebecca from the Austrian Empire in 1909.
Frustrated by the FBI bureaucracy and the State Departments roadblocks during the Cole investigation, O'Neil resigns from the FBI and is hired by Kroll and Associates, the group providing "security" for the WTC.
O'Neill was sent to work in the WTC by Kroll in late August 2001 by the son of an avid Zionist involved in a movement that fought for the creation of Israel and is still invovled in seeing that apartheid state expand and thrive.

A job in which O'Neill, like many others, were killed on 9/11 by a foreign government working in concert with subversive elements within the US government.

The same day, in an interview with CBS News' Dan Rather, Rather also asks Hauer if the attacks could have been carried out without state sponsorship. Hauer replies: “I’m not sure I agree that this is necessarily state-sponsored. It… certainly has the fingerprints of somebody like bin Laden.”

Amazing. Hauer and his buds were completely clueless about the WTC attacks before 9/11, but on the day of the attacks, he's already tracked down and fingered a suspect.

What was Jerome up to during the dark days of 9/11?

On September 11, 2001, Jerome Hauer was a national security adviser with the Dept. of Health and Human Services, a managing director with Kroll Associates, the firm that provided 'security' to the WTC on and before the FALSE FLAG/INSIDE JOB of 9/11.
What a coincidence!

He also sat on the board of Emergent Biosolutions.
Emergent BioSolutions Inc. is a leading biopharmaceutical company a develop, manufacture and commercialize immune related biologics, vaccines and biotherapeutics that assist the body’s immune system to prevent or treat infectious and other life threatening diseases. Our marketed product, BioThrax® (Anthrax Vaccine Adsorbed), is the only vaccine licensed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for the prevention of anthrax infection.
Sweet. A company that manufactures vaccines for Anthrax, Typhoid and Botulinum.
Bioport is an extremely controversial pharmaceutical company that manufactures a despicable anthrax vaccine linked to deaths and injuries in the U.S. military. After years of litigation, the vaccine can no longer be administered to soldiers on a mandatory basis. Recent legislation – referred to as Bioshield 2 or BARDA – is attempting to grant complete liability bail-outs to specific pharmaceuticals labeled “countermeasures.” BioPort is positioning itself to gain immunity from litigation if its anthrax vaccine is massively deployed for emergency mandatory vaccination of civilians.
Hauer also is on the board of some company called "Hollis-Eden Pharmaceuticals," out San Diego, CA. What they do or who they do it to, good luck finding out, since they are a private company and not subject to public review.

And guess what, "Hollis-Eden Pharmaceuticals" also is involved in developing immune vaccines for shit like anthrax.

How many 'coincidences' can there be in one person's biography?



w said...

You are right to point out the 'HOLES' similarities, they remind me of that 'HOLES' @ Pentagon.

USS Liberty was an Israeli-American joint operation (False Flag) just like 9/11. “Operation Cyanide” which nearly caused World War III is actually a Conspiracy Fact backed by facts, I urge everyone to read this most important document... about the USS Liberty

Apparently the No of US personnel wounded was 294 instead of the widely circulated '174'.

Greg Bacon said...

This is what happens when you're goverment has been hijacked by a nation of bigots, racists, false flag experts and mass murderers.

Anonymous said...

I realise this response is a little late to the party, being almost 15 years after the attack on the USS Cole, however there are some interesting facts that have been left out or overlooked. The USS Cole was not the first ship to go to Aden to refuel, it had been done several times by several different ships (USS The Sullivans, USS Hawes, USS Donald Cook to name three). Refueling in a foreign port is a common practice, especially in one where the US is trying to improve relations with the government or is an ally. You could consider the refuelling as a flying the flag mission, where the locals get used to seeing American presence in a non-threatening, economic stimulating way.

The fuel dolphin is located out in the water, not directly attached to land, so the most common means of access is boats. The boat that pulled up alongside was very similar to others being used to bring provisions and remove refuse. The fact that it pulled up on the wrong side of the ship seems glaring now, however it was fairly common up to that point as the only direction given to the guys in the service boat is usually "go there, do this" and not direction on where to approach the ship. This has since been modified.

After looking at the inside of the hole, both personally and in pictures, I highly doubt a missile would have done the damage. The blast was from the outside in, spread across a larger than a 2' radious would explain. A lot of energy was expended on the outside of the ship, throwing life rafts a considerable distance, spreading dirt and debris all over the topside, and even damaging the flag bag wich is almost midships and several decks up. A missile would have been a more point detonation where areas that were damaged would have been shielded by the structure of the ship. Again, there are indications of a physically large explosive, not more like a point explosive a missile warhead is.

Damage inside was considerable, but not well shaped. Instead of lancing through the ship, it was more of a radial explosion. An anti-ship missile would put out more of a shaped cone as the missile would attempt to cut through the ship, damaging as much internally and posible causing the explosion to exit the far side. The missile would also be more likely to be shaped to keep the damage at or close to the waterline as water is the great enemy to a ship after an explosion. Allowing the force to dissipate up and down would simply not get the job done. I believe the attackers thought they could put enough explosives on the small boat to cut the ship in half, and they probably did. However the force was allowed to go any direction it could, wasting a significant amount of energy.

You can armchair quarterback this all day and twist it to fit a tin hat conspiracy theory, however that doesn't help fix the problem or get to the real reasons why the attack occurred and prevent this type of thing from happening again. This wasn't a big PR win for anyone in the US, and it wasn't a big enough PR win for AlQaeda, they had to attack the world trade center the next year to get the world's attention.

Shangri-la said...

Time USA show Evidence to Back Their Lies? You are not Guilty until Proven and there is no Evidence these alleged hijackers even boarded the planes more Evidence points o Israeli Involvment how fast all these were sent back to Israel by Chertoff Investigate this Action US of Slaves?

Protocols of Elders of Zion Exposer said...

The savage Zionist Neanderthals doing their best work.

Protocols of Elders of Zion Exposer said...

The savage Zionist Neanderthals doing their best work.

Shangri-la said...

Ever wonder why all info on Israeli involvement has been removed from MEDIA THESE GUYS DROVE AROUND IN AZMURAL PAINTED TRUCK Dipicting VERY THING THAT HAPPENED THIS DAY? ISRAELIS WERE IN TRUCKS WITH explosives? Yet They are returned to Israel? Had these been Muslims the Media would have been all over these People? They possibly would still be incarcerated till today!

Fair Use Notice

This web site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance the understanding of humanity's problems and hopefully to help find solutions for those problems. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. A click on a hyperlink is a request for information. Consistent with this notice you are welcome to make 'fair use' of anything you find on this web site. However, if you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. You can read more about 'fair use' and US Copyright Law at the Legal Information Institute of Cornell Law School. This notice was modified from a similar notice at Information Clearing House.

Blog Archive