Saturday, August 18, 2012

9/11: Those 19 Ayyyrabs and Their Mile Wide Trail of Evidence

We're led to believe that 19 devout Muslims liked to drink copious amounts of booze, snort dope, visit strips bars (leaving a copy of the Koran), that U.S. airport security would fail four times within a few minutes, that U.S. air defenses would fail across the board to intercept the hijacked airliners and that hijackers lacking in flight skills could conduct the exotic flight maneuvers that top gun fighter pilots say are beyond their own skills?

We're suppose to believe that those 19 Ayyyrabs could be that skillful, that cunning, that devious, then be so dumb as to leave so many clues and a trail big enough for a blind man to see, including numerous copies, left in convenient places for the FBI to 'find,' of their holy book, the Koran?
Why are the U.S. media untroubled that there has been no independent investigation of 9-11?

Why are the media unconcerned that the rules governing preservation of forensic evidence were not followed by federal authorities?

Why do the media brand skeptics of the official line "conspiracy theorists" and "kooks"?

What is wrong with debate and listening to both sides of the defining issue of our time? If the official line is so correct and defensible, what does it have to fear from skeptics?
Source: The always reliable Paul Craig Roberts
The text of a handwritten, five-page document found in Mohamed Atta’s luggage is made public. [FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, 9/28/2001; WASHINGTON POST, 9/28/2001; OBSERVER, 9/30/2001]

The next day, the London Independent will strongly question if the note is genuine. It points out that the “note suggests an almost Christian view of what the hijackers might have felt,” and is filled with “weird” comments that Muslims would never say, such as “the time of fun and waste is gone.” If the note “is genuine, then the [hijackers] believed in a very exclusive version of Islam—or were surprisingly unfamiliar with their religion.”[INDEPENDENT, 9/29/2001]

Another copy of the document was discovered in a vehicle parked by a Flight 77 hijacker at Washington’s Dulles airport. A third copy of essentially the same document was found in the wreckage of Flight 93. Therefore, the letter neatly ties most of the hijackers together. [CBS NEWS, 9/28/2001]

The Guardian comments, “The finds are certainly very fortunate, though some might think them a little too fortunate.” [GUARDIAN, 10/1/2001]
Source: History Commons

And that a paper passport could survive a crash, explosion, fire, more explosions and the crashing down of thousands of tons of melted steel and concrete that had been turned into powder, only to be 'found' by a FBI agent on TOP of some WTC rubble?

The passport of Satam Al Suqami which survived a fire that melted steel, but couldn't burn paper.

Photobucket

‘If it were as simple and straightforward as a lucky one-off oddball operation, then the seeds of confusion would not have been sown as they were.’

Journalist Seymour Hersh further reports, “Many of the investigators believe that some of the initial clues that were uncovered about the terrorists’ identities and preparations, such as flight manuals, were meant to be found. A former high-level intelligence official told me, ‘Whatever trail was left was left deliberately—for the FBI to chase.’”
A trail left by Muslims with names like Ariel and Shlomo.
Investigators find a remarkable number of possessions left behind by the hijackers:

Two of Mohamed Atta’s bags are found on 9/11. They contain a handheld electronic flight computer, a simulator procedures manual for Boeing 757 and 767 aircraft, two videotapes relating to “air tours” of the Boeing 757 and 747 aircraft, a slide-rule flight calculator, a copy of the Koran, Atta’s passport, his will, his international driver’s license, a religious cassette tape, airline uniforms, a letter of recommendation, “education related documentation” and a note (see September 28, 2001) to other hijackers on how to mentally prepare for the hijacking. [SYDNEY MORNING HERALD, 9/15/2001; BOSTON GLOBE, 9/18/2001; INDEPENDENT, 9/29/2001; ASSOCIATED PRESS, 10/5/2001]

Marwan Alshehhi’s rental car is discovered at Boston’s Logan Airport containing an Arabic language flight manual, a pass giving access to restricted areas at the airport, documents containing a name on the passenger list of one of the flights, and the names of other suspects. The name of the flight school where Atta and Alshehhi studied, Huffman Aviation, is also found in the car. [LOS ANGELES TIMES, 9/13/2001]

A car registered to Nawaf Alhazmi is found at Washington’s Dulles Airport on September 12. Inside is a copy of Atta’s letter to the other hijackers, a cashier’s check made out to a flight school in Phoenix, four drawings of the cockpit of a 757 jet, a box cutter-type knife, maps of Washington and New York, and a page with notes and phone numbers. [ARIZONA DAILY STAR, 9/28/2001; COX NEWS SERVICE, 10/21/2001; DIE ZEIT (HAMBURG), 10/1/2002]

In a bar the night before 9/11, after making predictions of a attack on America the next day, the hijackers leave a business card and a copy of the Koran at the bar. The FBI also recovers the credit card receipts from when they paid for their drinks and lap dances. [ASSOCIATED PRESS, 9/14/2001]

A bag hijackers Alhazmi and Almihdhar left at a mosque in Laurel, Maryland, is found on September 12. The bag contains flight logs and even receipts from flight schools from San Diego the year before (see September 9, 2001).

...former high-level intelligence official: “Whatever trail was left was left deliberately—for the FBI to chase” (see Late September 2001)

According to the 9/11 Commission, the passports of two hijackers are discovered in the wreckage of Flight 93. One passport, belonging to Saeed Alghamdi, is damaged but still readable. The other passport, belonging to Ziad Jarrah, is burned most of the way through, but part of his photograph is still visible. In addition, the passport of hijacker Abdulaziz Alomari is recovered because apparently it was put in Mohamed Atta’s luggage and the luggage did not get put on the flight Alomari and Atta were hijacking before it took off (see September 11-13, 2001). The recovery of these passports will not be made public at the time and will only be mentioned in passing in 2004 by the 9/11 Commission. A fourth passport, that of Satam Al Suqami, was also recovered on a street near the WTC. That did become immediate news and caused skepticism by many who wondered how a paper document could survive such a crash (see After 8:46 a.m. September 11, 2001). [9/11 COMMISSION, 1/26/2004]
Source: History Commons

Anyone who still believes in the official 9/11 story is either a Zionist dupe or disinfo agent; part of the ‘wrecking crew’ of MOSSAD, CIA and FBI agents that pulled off the FALSE FLAG/INSIDE JOB or is someone that should be kept away from sharp objects.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

3 comments:

w said...

Strange that there were "witnesses" seeing planes on 9/11 but no witnesses ever came forward saying they saw the 19 Hijackers in any of the airports on 9/11. The whole hijacking scenario was based on a CNN CCTV pic of Atta @ Logan airport which was proven fake by the date stamped on it

John Friend said...

w is absolutely right, there were no hijackers, no hijackings, no Ayyyyrab terrorists, no planes, no phone calls to family members, the entire narrative is utterly ridiculous and fraudulent. It's all a fraud folks! One big Hollywood PSYOP! Incredible, but true.

Broad Paul said...

that devious, then be so dumb as to leave so many clues and a trail big enough for a blind man to see, including numerous copies, left in convenient. luxury apartments london

Fair Use Notice

This web site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance the understanding of humanity's problems and hopefully to help find solutions for those problems. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. A click on a hyperlink is a request for information. Consistent with this notice you are welcome to make 'fair use' of anything you find on this web site. However, if you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. You can read more about 'fair use' and US Copyright Law at the Legal Information Institute of Cornell Law School. This notice was modified from a similar notice at Information Clearing House.

Blog Archive