Thursday, May 9, 2013

PROOF that Israel NUKED Damascus


Don't look for any real news on ZNN, FAUX or BSnbc, they're too busy covering a kidnapping or a trial of someone called Arias and other planned Zionist distractions to keep your mind floating in a pool of sewerage, constantly polluted with useless gossip that is anything but news.

The Zionist front outlets are in protect mode, sheltering that psychotic State of Hate, Israel, from any repercussions from the mini-nuke it dropped on Damascus this past weekend.

Even so-called 'alternative' news outlets, like Amy Goodman's "Democracy Now" are avoiding this story, which show you how deep the rot goes in the American MSM.

Here's the proof:

nuked_Damascus_5.5.13 photo frame1_zpsaf013f4f.gif

Unofficial damage report (got out during initial chatter) - 2 entire military divisions and a key airport.
Here is the video the above captures were taken from. As you can HEAR, the blast was 3.8 KM away and behind a mountain, and it still got FAR brighter than the sun from horizon to horizon and even in the shadows on the ground. The blast totally clipped ALL CAMERA SENSOR SITES TO WHITE, EVEN ON THE GROUND, A CLASSIC NUCLEAR BLAST. [NOTE: You'll have to go to the page to see the movie, which is on some type of media player and not on Jewtube.]

Ah, but the shills are in overdrive, calling this a MOAB. Don´t be a DUFUS by believing them. WHY do all the "expert opinions" omit the moment of criticality frames and show the blast only after it has almost totally faded to black? Because that is what a moab would really look like, FADED ALMOST TO BLACK, compared to a nuke. They are not going to try to make their cases with any frames that instantly vet their lies.

55 dead?

As I predicted, the elite establishment is lying about the number of dead in Syria. For the record: Russia, within an hour of the blast, had a dead reporter and the surviving reporters specifically stated they counted over 300 dead in the first hour. If anyone knows about death toll numbers, they go UP after the first hour, in Japan they initially said 300 confirmed dead. Then Syria reported the complete loss of 2 entire military divisions, and the Aleppo airport to three huge blasts "of a weapons type they had not witnessed before". So the real death count (could) be in the tens of thousands, and Syria might not even have a real military left.

And this gets me on a rant -

I WAS IN CONTACT WITH PEOPLE ON THE GROUND IN JENIN, WHO SENT ME THOUSANDS OF PHOTOS. THEY WERE HIDING ON THE THIRD FLOOR AND SENDING TINY PHOTOS OUT WITH A CELL PHONE. THEY DOCUMENTED PEOPLE BEING LINED UP FACE DOWN IN THE STREET AND BEING SHOT, AND ESTIMATED OVER 4,000 DIED. THEY WERE SCARED, BECAUSE THEIR STREET WAS NEXT TO BE PURGED. THEY THEN WENT SILENT.

Source

If you don't believe your lying eyes, maybe you'll start believing that Israel is not above using nukes on helpless nations when they fully exercise their SAMSON option, which is a nuclear hissy fit that bunch of Khazar loonies plan on visiting on the entire planet, if they feel like they aren't getting their way.



2 comments:

  1. Their murderous intent confirmed by Prof. Martin Van Creveld of Hebrew University: 'Our armed forces are not the thirtieth strongest in the world, but rather the second or third. We have the capability to take the world down with us. And I can assure you that this will happen before Israel goes under.'

    http://www.sweetliberty.org/issues/israel/destroycaps.html

    He also talks of 'collective deportation' of the Palestinians.

    I just hope that his is a lonely voice in the wilderness.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I just hope that his is a lonely voice in the wilderness.

    Me too, but he appears to be the cheerleader for he current batch of nuts in charge of Stolenland.

    Using nukes beats the hell out of sending your Bolshevik Jews into homes with pistols, the nukes are so much more efficient.

    ReplyDelete

Fair Use Notice

This web site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance the understanding of humanity's problems and hopefully to help find solutions for those problems. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. A click on a hyperlink is a request for information. Consistent with this notice you are welcome to make 'fair use' of anything you find on this web site. However, if you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. You can read more about 'fair use' and US Copyright Law at the Legal Information Institute of Cornell Law School. This notice was modified from a similar notice at Information Clearing House.

Blog Archive