Friday, September 20, 2013

UPDATE: More JEW Media Treachery

The story that was broke by the BBC, "Navy Yard: Swat team 'stood down' at mass shooting scene," hasn't been covered by that "paper of record," the New York Times or that other Zionist Jew handout, CNN.

You'd think that a story about a nearby SWAT team, ready to deploy and take out the shooter--or maybe shooters--at the Navy Yard slaughter, but was told to 'stand down,' would be front page headlines, but the only places that are covering this bizarre madness are alternative news outlets, like "From the Trenches World Report."

Here's part of the story that ran on the BBC's web page:
One of the first teams of heavily armed police to respond to Monday's shooting in Washington DC was ordered to stand down by superiors, the BBC can reveal.

A tactical response team of the Capitol Police, a force that guards the US Capitol complex, was told to leave the scene by a supervisor instead of aiding municipal officers.

The Capitol Police department said senior officials were investigating.

Aaron Alexis, 34, killed 12 people at the Washington Navy Yard.

"I don't think it's a far stretch to say that some lives may have been saved if we were allowed to intervene," a Capitol Police source familiar with the incident told the BBC.
Yet, when you plug in "Navy Yard: Swat team 'stood down' at mass shooting scene," into the NYT search engine, you'll get back 46 hits and none of the articles are about the 'stand down' order given that could have saved lives.

Enter 'Miley Cyrus' into that same engine, and you'll get a whopping 14,40 hits at the JEW York Times.

The same goes for CNN, headed by Jeff Zucker, an uber Zionist "utterly dedicated to Israel."

CNN has hundreds and hundreds of Miley Cyrus stories, but zilch about the Navy Yard SWAT team being waved off.

Here's what Amber Lyon, who worked for CNN in the past, has to say about 'ZNN.'
In October 2011, Amber Lyon told a European news service that she had been directed by CNN to report selectively, repetitively, and falsely in order to sway public opinion in favor of direct American aggression against Iran and Syria, and that this was common practice under CNN.... that the War on Terrorism had also been employed as a pretext to pre-empt substantive investigative journalism within the U.S., and that following the Bahrain reporting, her investigative department had been terminated and "reorganized", and her severance and employee benefits used as a threat to intimidate and attempt to purchase her subsequent silence.
I tried to leave a comment on a CNN blog about a story related to the shootings, asking why ZNN didn't report on the BBC story, but my comment was tossed.

Time to wake up, America, and do it NOW, before the Jew war mongers, thieves, grifters, mass murders and corrupters finish their job of looting America of all its wealth, then tossing the USA away like a used condom.

UPDATE: HRM 'Mikey' Rivero, of WRH, whined yesterday that there was nothing nefarious in this matter, it was a simple matter of turf protection.

Here's a specific paragraph from that BBC article that refutes 'Mikey's' spiel:
Mr Gainer said that while the department's primary responsibility was to protect the Capitol complex, which houses the US Congress, that mission did not allow it to turn a "blind eye" when asked for help.
Mr. Gainer is the Senate Sergeant-at-Arms who oversees the Capitol Police.

What say ye now, 'Mikey' or do you have to ask your Yid Paymasters?

Here's another 'nefarious' sounding angle to this story. How many shooters were at the Navy Yard? From the "Huffington Post:"
Comey said there was no evidence that Alexis fired shots down into the atrium despite initial accounts from witnesses at the scene.
Sounds like there were multiple shooters at the Navy Yard massacre. What will the autopsies show, and what is the name of the firm that was providing physical security to that installation?

I smell an ICTS or a Kroll type of Jew firm that provided 'security' to the Navy Yard.

UPDATE as of Friday afternoon, 9.20.13:

It's been nearly two days now since I emailed the New York Times, Veterans Today, McClatchy, and the KC Star about the Navy yard incident, I copied and pasted into the email part of the BBC story, "Navy Yard: Swat team 'stood down' at mass shooting scene."

I included a short paragraph asking them why they haven't covered this story and did it in a respectful manner.

Here's their replies:

Any questions?

I was hoping for a reply from at least one, like Veterans Today or McClatchy, in particular, because the following vow is what they have plastered on the front of the web page:

"I make this commitment to our readers, and to our citizens: McClatchy journalists will report fairly and independently. We will not make deals with those in power, regardless of party or philosophy."

James Asher, Bureau Chief

“The basis of our governments being the opinion of the people, the very first object should be to keep that right; and were it left to me to decide whether we should have a government without newspapers or newspapers without a government, I should not hesitate a moment to prefer the latter. But I should mean that every man should receive those papers and be capable of reading them.”

Thomas Jefferson to Edward Carrington, 1787

Lock and Load time?

P.S. To the Feds that read this blog, I don't hear voices in my head.

But there is an at-large psychopath that not only hears and brags about voices in his head, is mentally unstable, which he's tried to compensate for with massive amounts of drugs and alcohol and has committed a tremendous amount of violence, killing at least 2 million people.

His name is George W. Bush and he lives in Dallas, Texas.



    I agree with you. Michael Rivero's (non) handling of the stand down order to the SWAT team at the DC navy yard does not pass the smell test. He is exposing himself a form of controlled opposition like Aangirfan and Daily Paul.

    Rivero is also completely wrong about there being a plane that hit the pentagon on 9/11, about men walking on the moon, about chemtrails, about haarp.

    Why is Michael Rivero telling untruths that are easily refuted? He is cancelling his own credibilty as a truthseeker by propagating these untruths. Thus when he ignores an important standdown order which identifies the Navy yard shooting as a psy-op/false flag - it is hard to believe Rivero is telling the truth.

    The truth shall set you free - even you Michael Rivero.

  2. Anon, I agree about 'Mikey.'

    He's either a delusional megalomaniac or a Yid double-agent, or most likely, both, since that would fit in with the 'Chosen Ones' feelings of superiority.

  3. Hell, Greg/ You know those SWAT teams are better at attacking unarmed ppl at wrong addresses. Their shots are meant for innocents and dogs (and the occasional pot smoker), not mass murderers.

  4. Good Article!

    ✡ ✈ ▌▌ ✡ ✈ ▌▌

  5. Rivero and Fatboy do good cop/bad.

    Have for a long time.

    MR did "special effects" for the
    moon hoax.

    He's one of their better propagandists.

  6. Anon, if you read Les Visible's blog, Smoking Mirrors,a couple of weeks ago, he mentions that Rivero is under attack and needs our support financially and spiritually.

    Shortly after, Les said that someone was trying to break into his house and that black SUV's and helicopter were going around in the dead of night.

    It seems being associated with Rivero can be toxic. A few years ago, Visible rattled some heads when he stood up for SOTT or Sign Of The Times website when they were under attack.

    Something very strange is going on.

  7. Lee, what's going on isn't that strange, as the criminals running and running the planet will stop at nothing to eliminate those they deem to be troublemakers, which means anyone who stands up to their murderous ways.

    Les Visible runs a popular blog, it wouldn't surprise me if he was under some kind of attack.

    And since they have a wide array of advanced weapons to use, they could attack people from a distance.

    Another blogger, JB Campbell, posted on his blog that awhile back, he and his wife saw a hovering drone outside their window and shortly after, they both became violently sick.

    Standing up and speaking the truth could cost a person their life.


Fair Use Notice

This web site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance the understanding of humanity's problems and hopefully to help find solutions for those problems. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. A click on a hyperlink is a request for information. Consistent with this notice you are welcome to make 'fair use' of anything you find on this web site. However, if you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. You can read more about 'fair use' and US Copyright Law at the Legal Information Institute of Cornell Law School. This notice was modified from a similar notice at Information Clearing House.

Blog Archive