Saturday, November 16, 2013

VIDEO: Exposing the LIES about the 9/11 FALSE FLAG

Many people still believe what our corrupt, hijacked, Israeli ass-kissing government told us about the 9/11 FALSE FLAG/INSIDE JOB, which was actually pulled off by the White House and elements of the FBI, CIA, NSA and the Pentagon. Orchestrated by Israel and funded by the FED and those 'Too Big to Fail' Wall Street banks.

A_11.16.13 photo 911commissionkicked_zps133ae381.gif

That's because 9/11 was seared into our collective brains that day, branded you might say, due to the shock and horror of what we were told by the JEW MSM was happening on our TalmudVision sets.

That would be like the cops showing you a fairly well-faked video of your wife and kids--two hours after their deaths--getting beaten to death by some black gang-bangers, when the truth it was the cops who beat your family to death.
The shock and horror of watching your loved ones getting smashed into the pavement would have an immediate impact on your brain and ability to think. The initial shock, grief and horror of that tragic event would be surpassed by an overwhelming desire to get revenge... against the ones shown as the culprits in the video.

Take a look at this video and see what you see, then try and explain what happened to yourself.

I didn't catch what the video poster did, but what impact me was that the plane, at that speed, looked totally fake.


"How Many 9/11 Masterminds Can YOU Name?"

What do these 'Kosher Kowboys' know about 9/11?

2,000 year old blueprint for the 9/11 FALSE FLAG/INSIDE JOB.

"Foreigners will rebuild your walls,
and their kings will serve you. [...]
Your gates will always stand open,
they will never be shut, day or night,
so that men may bring you the wealth of the nations — their kings led in triumphal procession.
For the nation or kingdom that will not serve you will perish; it will be utterly ruined."

["utterly wasted", "utterly destroyed" in
some translations]

Jewish Old Testament, Isaiah, Chapter 60:10-12


buelahman said...

That video is damning eveidence of fakery.

I have watched the Sept Clues video a couple times and it shows other anomalies regarding planes.

The problem I have with it is that it doesn't do a very good job proving that the demolition is faked, yet they swear it. It wasn't convincing. Nor are their claims that No ONE died that day.

On another note: ZCF and Mark Glenn are patting each other on the back that I am a redneck and they are muslims. Great!

hamburgertime said...

What bothers me about the many "Video fakery" analyses I've seen are the analyst's apparent obliviousness to the very relevant factor of the technical details of video compression. When I see someone pointing to the mpeg artifacts/fuzz surrounding a moving object and calling it conclusive proof of an object having been inserted "layered" into the image I just shake my head and wonder why they're expending so much energy leading people down blind alleys.

Without unpacking the claims of structural engineering expertise on the part of the video's narrator, when I look at this video what I see is entirely consistent with a plane crashing into that specific building. The size and composition of the exterior and inner core is known, and the crash behaves as expected.

Given the above, when I see the wing apparently disappear behind a building it is supposed to be in front of, I am inclined to write it off as one of the nuances of digital video compression. Raw, uncompressed digital video is generally the equivalent of 15-60 uncompressed bitmap stills per second, and the file size is enormous, therefore it is compressed to eliminate a great deal of redundant information and reduce file size. In simple terms a compressed video is a video file interspersed with key frames containing the whole image, with the bulk of the data telling the video player what part of the image differs from frame to frame, either from the previous key frame, or the upcoming key frame. This guy has written very good explanations of video compression, among other things. (I reference Dan Rutter only for a technical overview of compression. Though I've enjoyed his writings over the years he appears to be an avid cool aid drinker)

There is little contrast between the wing and the building, so, though I am not an expert, it is my informed opinion that the compression codec was set to such a highly compressed setting (not to mention probably re-compressed many times before being delivered here on youtube, at the very least once in the recording device, perhaps once on original upload, once on editing by the above narrator, and once by youtube) that it simply conserved data by keeping the image of the building as the wing passed in front, as there was so little difference between the persistent image of the building, and the brief moment when the wing passed over it, in terms of visual data in the small block of pixels in which the building occupied.

By the way Greg, given your analogy of video fakery and innocent loved ones being kicked around, wouldn't it have been more appropriate to post the original video of the old lady, or was the switch intentional?

Fair Use Notice

This web site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance the understanding of humanity's problems and hopefully to help find solutions for those problems. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. A click on a hyperlink is a request for information. Consistent with this notice you are welcome to make 'fair use' of anything you find on this web site. However, if you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. You can read more about 'fair use' and US Copyright Law at the Legal Information Institute of Cornell Law School. This notice was modified from a similar notice at Information Clearing House.

Blog Archive