Read this magnificent speech and then see if you can detect the "insidious wiles" of Israeli influence in the talk.
"a passionate attachment of one nation for another produces a variety of evils. Sympathy for the favorite nation, facilitating the illusion of an imaginary common interest in cases where no real common interest exists, and infusing into one the enmities of the other, betrays the former into a participation in the quarrels and wars of the latter without adequate inducement or justification. It leads also to concessions to the favorite nation of privileges denied to others which is apt doubly to injure the nation making the concessions; by unnecessarily parting with what ought to have been retained, and by exciting jealousy, ill-will, and a disposition to retaliate, in the parties from whom equal privileges are withheld. And it gives to ambitious, corrupted, or deluded citizens (who devote themselves to the favorite nation), facility to betray or sacrifice the interests of their own country, without odium, sometimes even with popularity; gilding, with the appearances of a virtuous sense of obligation, a commendable deference for public opinion, or a laudable zeal for public good, the base or foolish compliances of ambition, corruption, or infatuation."To have with them as little political connection as possible" sounds like a wise foreign policy. Instead we have a variety of Israeli lap dogs, lackey's and Zionist psychos running for President, each shouting that they are Israel's best friend and that they would have no problem sending American troops AGAIN, to fight wars for Israel while neglecting our falling-apart nation. Money that should be spent of repairing our decrepit highways and bridges, our overloaded electrical grid, our outdated nuclear power plants and dams--that hold back potable water and waste--and upgrading our crowded and outdated schools, instead is spent on Israel or given to that nation of racists and bigots in lump sums, at the same time, we give them advanced weaponry.
As avenues to foreign influence in innumerable ways, such attachments are particularly alarming to the truly enlightened and independent patriot. How many opportunities do they afford to tamper with domestic factions, to practice the arts of seduction, to mislead public opinion, to influence or awe the public councils. Such an attachment of a small or weak towards a great and powerful nation dooms the former to be the satellite of the latter.
Against the insidious wiles of foreign influence (I conjure you to believe me, fellow-citizens) the jealousy of a free people ought to be constantly awake, since history and experience prove that foreign influence is one of the most baneful foes of republican government. But that jealousy to be useful must be impartial; else it becomes the instrument of the very influence to be avoided, instead of a defense against it. Excessive partiality for one foreign nation and excessive dislike of another cause those whom they actuate to see danger only on one side, and serve to veil and even second the arts of influence on the other. Real patriots who may resist the intrigues of the favorite are liable to become suspected and odious, while its tools and dupes usurp the applause and confidence of the people, to surrender their interests."
The great rule of conduct for us in regard to foreign nations is in extending our commercial relations, to have with them as little political connection as possible.
What George Washington Would Have Said About Netanyahu
In remarks made at a foreign policy conference at the University of Virginia, Philip Zelikow says that Iraq is more of a threat to Israel than to the US and that protecting Israel would be a major motive for a US-Iraq war.
Zelikow was the executive head of the phony 9/11 Commission that ignored massive amounts of evidence so the blame--worked out ahead of the investigation--could be placed on Muslims for 9/11 when in fact, it was an Israeli False Flag.
Thanks to andie531!