Wednesday, September 9, 2015

Why a Passenger Jet DID NOT Crash into the Pentagon on 9/11

Wouldn't you say this damage to the Pentagon on 9/11 looks so perfectly shaped, that it looks like it was caused by a planned explosion?
Pent_911 photo Pent_zpsg6fwdn1g.png

Actually, only the sleazy SOB's that pulled off the 9/11 False Flag really know what happened. To find that out, you'd have to question Israel, who masterminded the attack and the traitors in the WH, Pentagon, CIA, FBI and NSA that committed treason on that 'day of infamy.'

But my theory is that a passenger jet, a Boeing 757, could not have been used to attack the Pentagon, it is too fragile to penetrate concrete, especially the 9+ feet of heavily-reinforced concrete that was part of the Pentagon where the attack occurred.
Those that stick to the official story, pushed by the ones deeply involved in this False Flag, maybe they can explain how fires in excess of 2,000 degrees F were burning at the Pentagon after the attack?

Being a retired career firefighter, I've got some experience with structure fires and know that a contents fire--office furniture, the paint, carpet, woodwork and such on the room interior--can get up to as much as 1,100 degrees F, if the room is closed, but the Pentagon was definitely not closed, it had been gutted open like a butchered pig.
Jet fuel, in an open burn, burns at around 600 degrees F and inside a jet engine, where compression and air is being added, it can burn up to 1,700 degrees, but the Pentagon wasn't a jet engine and besides, most of the fuel or whatever burnt up on the initial explosion.

So something external had to be added to get the fire on the Pentagon's interior to burn at 2,000 degrees F, like the explosive residue from ordinance.
"I don't want to alarm anybody right now, but apparently—it felt just a few moments ago like there was an explosion of some kind here at the Pentagon."

Jim Miklaszewski, NBC Pentagon correspondent reporting from inside the Pentagon at 09:39...
TWO minutes after the initial blast, impact or whatever.Or how the alleged pilot, Hani Hanjour, could pilot a Boeing 757 when he couldn't even fly a single-engine Cessna?

You can see this Youtube video of the alleged attackers going thru 'security' at Dulles, and notice two things: One is that they have blocked out the date and time stamp and two, that the sound is turned off. Why?
If you want the answer to that question, you'd have to ask the Israeli company, ICTS in charge of 'security' at Dulles on 9/11.

And like the attack in NYC, paper identification was found, Nawaf al-Hazmi's drivers license was found on a pile of rubble in the North parking lot. Maybe he tossed it out the window right before impact? But during the 'security' check, he was flagged for not having proper ID?

Boy, for a fire to burn at 2,000 degrees and not incinerate a paper driver's license must be something!

Take a look at these pics of passenger jets damaged by geese. Damage so severe, most of them had to make an emergency landing. Keep in mind that a typical 'Canadian goose' weighs around 8-10 pounds.

Pent1 photo Pent_bird_zpsagcq5hgf.jpg

And this one:

Pent2 photo Pent_bird3_zpstwwfuh3l.png

And one more:

 photo pent1_zpspfkvysuk.png

So we're supposed to believe that a Boeing 757 penetrated thru 310 feet of the Pentagon, including over 9 feet of heavily reinforced concrete, when a aluminum passenger jet can barely survive getting hit by a goose?
National Security Alert - 9/11 Pentagon Event

In 2006 Citizen Investigation Team launched an independent investigation into the act of terrorism which took place at the Pentagon on September 11, 2001. This exhaustive three-year inquest involved multiple trips to the scene of the crime in Arlington, Virginia, close scrutiny of all official and unofficial data related to the event, and, most importantly, first-person interviews with dozens of eyewitnesses, many of which were conducted and filmed in the exact locations from which they witnessed the plane that allegedly struck the building that day.

Be forewarned: Our findings are extraordinarily shocking and frightening. They are also deadly serious, and deserving of your immediate attention. This is not about a conspiracy theory or any theory at all. This is about independent, verifiable evidence which unfortunately happens to conclusively establish as a historical fact that the violence which took place in Arlington that day was not the result of a surprise attack by suicide hijackers, but rather a false flag "black operation" involving a carefully planned and skillfully executed deception.

Wow, look at all the aircraft debris on the Pentagon lawn after the attack!

Pent3 photo pentdeb_zpsmcygtsjo.png

Now if you still think a Boeing passenger jet hit the Pentagon on 9/11, I'll respect your thinking, although I won't agree with it. That's what mature adults do, agree to disagree without resorting to name-calling or saying you're crazy or accuse you of 'poisoning the well.'

Just keep up the hunt for the real terrorists and scumbags that attacked the USA on 9/11.


  1. This is a no-brainer but I'm sure Popular Mechanics had an explanation.

  2. OMG....Mike Rivero will throw a hissy fit! ;)

  3. My question is why isn't Larry Shekelstein dead yet.

  4. 'Larry Shekelstein?'

    That's a good one, hadn't heard ol' slippery 'Lucky Larry called that.

  5. Some very good points have been made in this article. But what happened to the plane that so many witnesses reported seeing headed straight for the pentagon?

  6. MOST WANTED - fitness you x - sex xx - fat loss sexy - sex xx - orchids orchidaceae phalaenopsis care - dog food xx - baby potty xx - options trading xx - forex fx xx - fat loss xx -- betting money xx
    mesothelioma master xx


Please stick to the topic at hand. Anyone trying to hijack this blog with long, winding comments about other topics or spam will be booted.

Fair Use Notice

This web site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance the understanding of humanity's problems and hopefully to help find solutions for those problems. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. A click on a hyperlink is a request for information. Consistent with this notice you are welcome to make 'fair use' of anything you find on this web site. However, if you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. You can read more about 'fair use' and US Copyright Law at the Legal Information Institute of Cornell Law School. This notice was modified from a similar notice at Information Clearing House.

Blog Archive