Tuesday, December 1, 2015

British Ministry of Truth Said in 1944 That the Holocaust Must be Created to Distract from USSR Massacres

“There exists no document signed by Hitler, Himmler, or Heydrich speaking of exterminating Jews… and, the word ‘extermination’ does not appear in the letter from Herman Goering to Heydrich concerning the Final Solution of the Jewish question.”

Aryeh Leon Kubovy of the Israeli Center for Jewish Documentation

11.18.15 photo HoloHOA_zpsgvqfriuo.png

Shocking 1944 British government letter

This is a February 29, 1944 letter to the BBCand higher members of the British clergy, from the British Ministry of Information. It lays out in no uncertain terms the following:

We all know the crimes committed by the Bolsheviks over the last 24 years in Russia and Eastern Europe

It is inevitable they will do the same in Central Europe

We will cover up their crimes by lying about the Germans

The public is not as stupid as it was, our lies will be better

You (BBC & Church) must spread these lies, convincingly

I am directed by the Ministry to send you the following circular letter:

It is often the duty of the good citizens and of the pious Christians to turn a blind eye on the peculiarities of those associated with us.

But the time comes when such peculiarities, while still denied in public, must be taken into account when action by us is called for.

We know the methods of rule employed by the Bolshevik dictator in Russia itself from, for example, the writing and speeches of the Prime Minister himself during the last twenty years. We know how the Red Army behaved in Poland in 1920 and in Finland, Estonia, Latvia, Galicia and Bessarabia only recently.

We must, therefore, take into account how the Red Army will certainly behave when it overruns Central Europe. Unless precautions are taken, the obviously inevitable horrors which will result will throw an undue strain on public opinion in this country.

We cannot reform the Bolsheviks but we can do our best to save them -- and ourselves -- from the consequences of their acts. The disclosures of the past quarter of a century will render mere denials unconvincing. The only alternative to denial is to distract public attention from the whole subject.

Experience has shown that the best distraction is atrocity propaganda directed against the enemy. Unfortunately the public is no longer so susceptible as in the days of the "Corpse Factory," and the "Mutilated Belgian Babies," and the "Crucified Canadians."

Your cooperation is therefore earnestly sought to distract public attention from the doings of the Red Army by your wholehearted support of various charges against the Germans and Japanese which have been and will be put into circulation by the Ministry.

Your expression of belief in such may convince others.

I am, Sir, Your obedient servant, (signed) H. HEWET, ASSISTANT SECRETARY

The Ministry can enter into no correspondence of any kind with regard to this communication which should only be disclosed to responsible persons.
This letter is reproduced in a 1958 book entitled: Allied Wartime Diplomacy: A Pattern in Poland by Edward J. Rozek.

the image below is captured from the first edition. Pages 209/210
Rozek_11.2015 photo Brit_holo_zpspoyrkcin.jpg
The British 'Ministry of Truth' is/was actually the British Ministry of Information, which excelled at disseminating propaganda aimed at Germany during WW11, including the almost immediate UNAUTHORIZED rejection of Hitler's offer of peace terms in 1940 to England instead of all-out war.

Compare the nastiness of Delmer's rejection of Hitler's peace in 1940 with Hitler politely declining an offer by Delmer to give his opinions on the state of the British financial crisis in 1931.

Denis Sefton Delmer, a Jew journalist working for the BBC, was the one who went on the air and rejected the offer in rather nasty terms.
Comment from "Radio Islam"

This is quite an astounding document. This letter is ample evidence that during World War II, the Allies used atrocity propaganda against Hitler Germany to distract their own people from the atrocities being committed primarily but not exclusively by the Red Army - their "comrades"! - in the invasion of Europe as Hitler's war drew to an end.

Note, though, that there was nothing in this letter that talked of gassing people.

Why not? Because foolish atrocity propaganda is something else again. The gas chamber claim was floated briefly as a propaganda test kite but was quickly abandoned as too "unbelievable." If atrocity fiction is found to be so gross, outlandish and implausible that thinking, feeling people simply cannot swallow it, it is not in an army leader's interest to peddle such a "crime."

This was the case originally with the "gas chamber" claim.

In point of fact, the British Ministry of Information at first requested British clergy to help spread the "gas chamber" story which was planned to be put in circulation by the Ministry. (Rozek, Edward J., Allied Wartime Diplomacy, pp 108-110. John Wiley and Sons, New York ) However, from the start, it was judged to be too problematic and bizarre and, therefore, it was quickly withdrawn as a potential strategic embarrassment.

Some of the "lesser" so-called "crimes" that people were willing to swallow did survive and thrive for a while, both during World War I and World War II - some of them for longer periods than others.

For example, many of the older generation, both in Europe and America, still vividly remember the macabre World War I Allied propaganda claims of the German ". . . cadavers-into-soap factories," the ". . . chopped-off hands of Belgian babies," the ". . . crucified Canadian soldier" stories - all of which proved to be lies, and for some of which post WWI Allied statesmen even apologized to the Germans....

Let us be very clear on one point: There would have been no hesitation to use the story of the "gassings" even during the war - had it been plausible. However, even during the war, the leadership of the Allied Nations - such as Churchill and Roosevelt as well as those of the Catholic hierarchy, including the then-Pope Pius XI - knew from their various intelligence agencies, spies on the ground, inmates with radio transmitters inside various camps (including inmate soldiers, inmate priests, even those who took confessions of local military, police and guard personnel) that no organized mass exterminations by gassing or any other means were going on inside these camps.

How did they know?

The Allied leaders had detailed aerial photos, none of which corroborated the hysterical claims then made by Zionist agitators like Rabbi Stephen Wise and others around the world. It simply wasn't true. There were no gassings of people going on - only of lice! The story was a cheese with many, many holes. And it was judged as problematic.

As a consequence, the Allied leadership specifically removed any reference to "gas chambers" in their wartime atrocity propaganda, even in their diplomatic dispatches, because there was no proof. (Allied Diplomacy in Wartime, Samisdat Resource Book, pp 108-110)
Standard Oil of New Jersey had been working with the German firm I.G. Farben to develop synthetic gasoline and rubber from coal. When WWII broke out, Standard Oil was forbidden from working with their German counterparts on the rubber project, but Standard was woefully behind the German's on this project.
So they got the Department of War to do regular intelligence photo flights over the I.G. Farben complex at Auschwitz to see if they could gather some hints as to how Germany was processing the coal into rubber.

NONE of those flight's photos showed any death camp or piles of bodies or people being herded into gas chambers for a simple reason; The Holocaust is a hoax.

This is a picture the Holocaust™ junkies don't want you to see. It's the IG Farben factory in Monowitz, a few miles away from Auschwitz that used slave labor from Auschwitz during WWII. Germans needed alive prisoners to work in these factories, necessitating a hospital at Auschwitz to keep the POW's in good health for work.Monowitz photo monowitz_zpsux1zkkto.jpg


  1. Excellent, GB. Perfect length and targeting. One to pass around.

  2. Thanks Greg...great work.

    Passing on.

  3. A Dutch publisher defended an assertion in a high school textbook that cash-strapped Britain’s support for Zionism owed to its desire to woo rich Jewish bankers.

    “Theme Workbook – The Middle East,” which is published by ThiemeMeulenhoff and intended for students attending pre-university secondary education — the highest scholastic track in the Dutch education system for minors — is “anti-Semitic,” Likoed Nederland, a pro-Israel local association named after the Israeli ruling party, said in a statement Wednesday.

    “The British government was in urgent need of money during World War I,” the history book reads on page 23, which explores the reasons for the Balfour Declaration. Issued in 1917 by the British minister responsible for the colonies, the declaration said that Britain viewed favorably the establishment of a national home for Jews in what would later become the Mandate over Palestine.

    “Jewish bankers were prepared to offer favorable loan terms if the government made a gesture toward the Jewish People,” the passage reads. The book also states that “the Holocaust led to the establishment of Israel” — a fact that Zionists dispute.


  4. Looks like the Dutch are going to get attacked by ISIS or Daesh or even the old school 'al CIA Duh!'

  5. Damn it, Greg.. You "anti-semite", you!!

    Now if I was to have published this article in Jew occupied Canuckleheadistan, I would have had the Canucklehead thought police at my door in an instant....

    I am not supposed to comment on this, due to Canada's draconian and ridiculous "hate crime" laws.. But all I can say is bravo!!!!

  6. The end is near, according to a Jewish teenager who had an NDE. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ijB_aaBChTU

    Notice the date Sept 11th comes up at 10:18

  7. "It's the IG Farben factory in Monowitz, a few miles away from Auschwitz that used slave labor from Auschwitz during WWII."

    This is a classic example of how stealth programming works on the mind. The workers at the Monowitz factory and other camps were NOT slave labor any more than present day American prisoners working for corporations are considered "slave labor."

    Concentration camp inmates were paid for their labor and there are many examples of existing camp script available on the web. In fact the Germans paid these prisoners at a much better percentage rate than present day American prisoners.



  8. Ydes, Unknown, the slave laborers were paid, but could not leave their place of employment or Auschwitz.

    That I consider to be slave labor.

    BTW, where's your blog? Or do you prefer to hide behind anonymity?

  9. Perhaps you have been watching the Hitler (History) channel too long. The idea of the German's using camp inmates as "slave labor" is a Jewish meme. Note Jews never refer to the inmates of their own sadistic Soviet gulag death camps as "slave labor". However, they were perhaps much closer to the definition than German camp inmates as they were not paid and were subject to summary execution by low level camp administrators, such as guards. Release was considered a joke, as few inmates of the gulag system thought they would survive their ordeal.

    The primary difference between slaves and prisoners is that slaves are typically enslaved/owned for life unless freed by their masters, whereas prisoners are incarcerated for a specified time period and then released. This highlights the other primary difference, slaves are not wards of a state, but privately owned by individuals. This has been the case throughout history.

    The inmates at the German camps were subject to release, which is why the sign said "Arbeit Macht Frei" Work makes one free. This was not a sadistic twist as the Jews might have us believe, but a fact of the camps. If one redeemed themselves and proved themselves productive members of German society, they were released. There are many documented cases of people released from the camps prior to the outbreak of war. Of course, the war changed that and camp inmates became incarcerated for the duration of the war as were the Japanese concentration camp inmates in America.

    The inmates at these camps were just that - prison inmates. Like prisoners in other countries, the inmates at the camps became wards of the state supervised and administered by the state. Of course wartime necessity was outside the normal prison routine as the Germans were fighting for their nation and their lives.

    Would you consider paid prisoners working for corporate America to be slaves? Boy Howdy! Wait until the "black-lives-matter" crowd hears that, we'll have another civil war. Of course, Jews will never allow that particular meme to circulate, as they are largely beneficiaries of the prison/police state.

    By the way, are you aware the very first mention of concentration camps is found in the book of Genesis? It is written that Joseph rounded up the Egyptians and put them in "cities". That's the same story were Joseph impoverishes and enslaves the Egyptian people while his "people", the Israelites, "lived off the fat of the land".

    "And Joseph bought all the land of Egypt for Pharaoh; for the Egyptians sold every man his field, because the famine prevailed over them: so the land became Pharaoh's. And as for the people, he removed them to cities from one end of the borders of Egypt even to the other end thereof."

    I do not have a "blog", I merely comment. However, here is my website - Conspiracyofman.com

  10. See comments #3 and #12


  11. If you still don't believe the Holocaust happened - watch this:


  12. dude it never happened get over it lol

  13. Dude - watch the video

  14. Why? It would be as if I was being told Santa Claus really does exist. At some point one needs to grow up and reject the nonsense we held dear as children. Or in your case as a child intellectually.

  15. "the Final Solution of the Jewish question.” was actually WORDS USED BY the Zionist leadership in Palestine when DEMANDING that Germany send a liaison to their HQ in Palestine to discuss "the Final Solution of the Jewish question.” Germany sent Adolf Eichmann because he was extremely bright, a Statesman, and grew up in a neighborhood of Jews - Hence, he was fluent in Yiddische and knew their customs, culture and religion. Eichmann came back to Germany with a 4-point Plan - conditions demanded by the Zionist leaders - that included 1. Germany must send the wealthiest Zionist Jews of Germany IMMEDIATELY; 2. The upper-middle class German Jews must be sent to Romania until the end of the war (this was 5-1/2 years before Britain declared war on Germany); and 3. The POOR and NON-Zionist Jews of Germany are to be sent to Auschwitz - for further disposition. See "The Transfer Agreement" by Jewish author, Edwin Black.

  16. I,for one, don't believe that the holocaust happened. It is an atrocity fabricated by England and the U.s. to hide what was really going on.


Please stick to the topic at hand. Anyone trying to hijack this blog with long, winding comments about other topics or spam will be booted.

Fair Use Notice

This web site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance the understanding of humanity's problems and hopefully to help find solutions for those problems. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. A click on a hyperlink is a request for information. Consistent with this notice you are welcome to make 'fair use' of anything you find on this web site. However, if you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. You can read more about 'fair use' and US Copyright Law at the Legal Information Institute of Cornell Law School. This notice was modified from a similar notice at Information Clearing House.

Blog Archive