Tuesday, January 3, 2017

Passenger Jet Forced to Crash Land by Geese, Yet on 9/11, a Similar Jet Blew Thru 9.5 FEET of Concrete and Steel, Traveling 300 Feet?

Why is there not a scratch on the Pentagon lawn after the crash of a large airliner that supposedly came in on a flat trajectory? Why did the detachable wings and tail section of the plane not sheer off upon impact at 400 mph? Why is the impact hole so small? Why in the 1500 reviewed photos of the accident scene is not one seat, cushion, or piece of luggage visible? Why did there happen to be multiple war-games being run from the Pentagon on the morning of 9/11 mimicking hijacked airplanes and terrorist attacks, causing confusion and chaos with FAA flight controllers as to whether what being reported that morning was 'real-world' or staged? How did five separate substantial lamp poles struck by the airplane cause no adverse effect on the hardware of the aircraft, nor its flight path? Why does the officially released flight data recorder show that the aircraft was hundreds of feet above those struck lamp poles as it flew past?

But the two most pertinent questions and anomalies in regards to the Pentagon and the 'official story' the public has been fed have nothing to do with investigating grand conspiracies or tracking down mis-represented evidence. They have to do with unreasonable suspensions in basic logic. The first is the fact that while almost all the victims of the attack were positively identified through DNA and dental records, we are also told that there is no significant remaining plane debris within the Pentagon because the intensity of the inferno after the crash wholly incinerated the aircraft and its component parts. These are two completely different and irreconcilable narratives.
You're probably familiar with the movie out, "Sully," that depicts the forced crash landing of an Airbus passenger jet into the Hudson River in 2009. So a flock of geese can so disable a passenger jet that is forced to crash land into a river, yet on 9/11, we were told that another passenger jet, American Airlines Flight 77 slammed into the Pentagon on 9/11, busting thru SIX blast walls for a total with a total of 9.5 FEET of heavily reinforced concrete and steel, with parts of the jet traveling nearly 300 FEET into the building, busting thru concrete walls? This does not make sense. How can a few geese so disable one passenger jet that they force a crash landing, but another similarly sized jet can bust thru concrete and steel?
Pentagon Renovation

“The renovation program included the following improvements to the building: Exterior walls reinforced with steel; Exterior walls backed with Kevlar; Blast-resistant windows installed..."

“Luck — if it can be called that — had it that the terrorists aimed the Boeing 757 at the only part of the Pentagon that already had been renovated in an 11-year, $1.3 billion project meant to bolster it against attack. That significantly limited the damage and loss of life by slowing the plane as it tore through the building and reducing the explosion’s reach.” – USA Today (1/01/02)
Yet, despite all the carnage, explosions and raging fire, the government was lucky, in that a paper ID was found, purported to be of one of the hijackers? A part of Nawaf al-Hazmi's driver's license in the North Parking Lot rubble pile? Amazing! Only in America..... and Nice and Brussels and Turkey.


But the official story line says it was a passenger jet hitting the Pentagon, why they even released a video purporting to show the jet hitting the Pentagon...


Look close, and use a magnifying glass and your imagination and you too can see what isn't there! I can't see any passenger jet hitting the Pentagon, but my government and the MSM wouldn't lie, would they?

Here's a pic of the alleged flight AA 77 debris left on the Pentagon lawn. The 757 weighs around 200,000 pounds when loaded, so where's the debris?


But when a similar jet hits some geese, all hell breaks loose, the jet sustains damage so serious, it's forced to crash-land in the Hudson River????
US Airways Flight 1549 was an Airbus A320-214 which, three minutes after takeoff from New York City's LaGuardia Airport on January 15, 2009, struck a flock of Canada geese just northeast of the George Washington Bridge and consequently lost all engine power. Unable to reach any airport, pilots Chesley Sullenberger and Jeffrey Skiles glided the plane to a ditching in the Hudson River off midtown Manhattan. All 155 people aboard were rescued by nearby boats and there were few serious injuries.

At 3:27:11 the plane struck a flock of Canada geese at an altitude of 2,818 feet (859 m) about 4.5 miles (7.2 km) north-northwest of the airport. The pilots' view was filled with the large birds, and passengers and crew later reported hearing "very loud bangs" and seeing flames from the engines, followed by silence and an odor of fuel.

On January 21, the NTSB found evidence of soft-body damage in the right engine along with organic debris including a feather. The left engine also evidenced soft body impact, with: "dents on both the spinner and inlet lip of the engine cowling. Five booster inlet guide vanes are fractured and eight outlet guide vanes are missing". Both engines, missing large portions of their housings, were sent to the manufacturer for examination

To prevent similar incidents, officials captured and gassed 1,235 Canada geese at 17 locations across New York City in mid-2009, and coated 1,739 goose eggs with oil to smother the developing goslings.
The authorities thought that future geese flights were so dangerous, they killed thousands but after 9/11, NO changes were made to building codes?


Just because the alleged pilots of Flight 77 couldn't even safely fly a small civilian craft doesn't mean they couldn't fly the much more complicated Boeing 757, does it?


Do YOU Have ESP? Can YOU Predict the Future?
Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz, Representatives Christopher Cox (R-CA) and John Mica (R-FL), and numerous others are meeting in Rumsfeld’s private Pentagon dining room, discussing missile defense (see (8:00 a.m.-8:50 a.m.) September 11, 2001). Rumsfeld later recalls, “I had said at an eight o’clock breakfast that sometime in the next two, four, six, eight, ten, twelve months there would be an event that would occur in the world that would be sufficiently shocking that it would remind people again how important it is to have a strong healthy Defense Department that contributes to—that underpins peace and stability in our world.” [Larry King Live, 12/5/2001]
According to some accounts, Vice President Dick Cheney is in the Presidential Emergency Operations Center (PEOC) below the White House by this time, along with Transportation Secretary Norman Mineta and others. Mineta will recall that, while a suspicious plane is heading toward Washington, an unidentified young man comes in and says to Cheney, “The plane is 50 miles out.” Mineta confers with acting FAA Deputy Administrator Monte Belger, who is at the FAA’s Washington headquarters. Belger says to him: “We’re watching this target on the radar, but the transponder’s been turned off. So we have no identification.” According to Mineta, the young man continues updating the vice president, saying, “The plane is 30 miles out,” and when he gets down to “The plane is 10 miles out,” asks, “Do the orders still stand?” In response, Cheney “whipped his neck around and said, ‘Of course the orders still stand. Have you heard anything to the contrary?’”
(9:31 a.m.-9:40 a.m.) September 11, 2001: Unidentified Military Planes Fly near Pentagon

Two unidentified military aircraft fly in the vicinity of the Pentagon at an altitude of over 20,000 feet, and are in the area during the minutes before the Pentagon is hit. [Federal Aviation Administration, 9/20/2001 pdf file; 9/11 Commission, 7/28/2003 pdf file] Between at least 9:31 a.m. and 9:40 a.m., the two aircraft communicate with the air traffic control tower at Washington’s Reagan National Airport, which is less than a mile from the Pentagon. [Federal Aviation Administration, 9/20/2001 pdf file; St. Petersburg Times, 10/3/2001] Radar data will show that they fly “in trail” (in single file, with one aircraft directly behind the other) at 21,000 feet, and are overhead during the last few minutes that Flight 77 is airborne, before it hits the Pentagon at 9:37 a.m. (see 9:37 a.m. September 11, 2001). [9/11 Commission, 7/28/2003 pdf file]
Launched from Delaware Base - The identities of the two aircraft are unclear. They have the call signs “Bobcat 14” and “Bobcat 17.” [Federal Aviation Administration, 9/20/2001 pdf file]
9:37 a.m. September 11, 2001: Witnesses See Military Cargo Plane near Flight 77; Pilot Later Implies He Is Far Away

A C-130 transport plane that has been sent to follow Flight 77 (see 9.36 a.m. September 11, 2001) is trailing only a short distance behind the plane as it crashes. This curious C-130, originally bound for Minnesota, is the same C-130 that will be 17 miles from Flight 93 when it later crashes into the Pennsylvania countryside (see 10:08 a.m. September 11, 2001).

No comments:

Post a Comment

Fair Use Notice

This web site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance the understanding of humanity's problems and hopefully to help find solutions for those problems. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. A click on a hyperlink is a request for information. Consistent with this notice you are welcome to make 'fair use' of anything you find on this web site. However, if you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. You can read more about 'fair use' and US Copyright Law at the Legal Information Institute of Cornell Law School. This notice was modified from a similar notice at Information Clearing House.

Blog Archive