Monday, February 5, 2018

JUDEN War Against Free Speech & Gentiles

Jewish War on Free Speech

We begin this week’s edition of Jewish War on Free Speech with the news that the Israeli Ministry for Diaspora Affairs has released a new system for tracking arbitrarily designated ‘anti-Semitic’ posts and material on both social media and the wider internet.

The fact that this is an overt attack on free speech and the concept of the Socratic dialogue itself by the jewish state on behalf of international jewry has passed people largely by. This is largely because jews are engaging in the sheer chutzpah of claiming that jews feel so scared in of Judeophobia in a society that measures virtue by how Judeophilic an individual or organisation is.

Good examples of this are the alarmist statements about ‘rising levels of anti-Semitism’ that have come out of Canada, Germany and Lithuania this week. While Rabbi Andrew Baker has discretely been reappointed to a role in the powerful inter-governmental organization ‘Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe’ (or OSCE) where his job is to stamp out both anti-Semitism and anti-Semites.

Just how wide this definition of ‘anti-Semitism’ is and how practically anyone who doesn’t have a wholly positive view of jews, Judaism and/or Israel is now an ‘anti-Semite’ is patently obvious when one but notes that this week alone. It has been declared by jews and/or pro-Israel organizations that:
- Running against a jew in an election is ‘anti-Semitic’.
- Refusing to be interviewed by a jew is ‘anti-Semitic’.
- Criticising a jew is ‘anti-Semitic’.
- Having an opinion is ‘anti-Semitic’.
- Waving a flag is ‘anti-Semitic’.
- Attending a Roman Catholic Mass is ‘anti-Semitic’.
- Having the wrong Christian Bible is ‘anti-Semitic’.
- Recording a private celebration is ‘anti-Semitic’.
- Supporting the Palestinian people is ‘anti-Semitic’.
- Holding an election on a Jewish holiday is ‘anti-Semitic’.
- Calling a jew ‘pro-Israel’ is ‘anti-Semitic’.
- Not doing whatever Israel wants is ‘anti-Semitic’.

Thus when we read about ‘anti-Israel boycott’ legislation or ‘standardised definitions of anti-Semitism’ – as has been argued for again by the Times of Israel this week – what we should understand by that is an attempt to silence any and all critics of jews, Judaism and Israel. Therefore we read with concern that jews are pushing such legislation in the state of Florida, while similar legislation has failed this week in South Carolina and been blocked by a federal judge in Kansas.

The result of such legislation has been aptly demonstrated in Hungary this week where a political march was cancelled simply because the jews objected to it. (1)

Oh and if you dare question your jewish masters then you clearly need more ‘Holocaust’ education!
From the free-thinking astute blog of "Semitic Controversies!"

Just thought I'd throw this in!


  1. "andrew baker" not a name
    i would have associated with "rabbi"

    i must be antisemitic/antiyid

  2. Oye vey.... You are an "anti-Semite" for putting up this article, Greg!!!!

    I wonder if the SPLC or the American Jewish council has you targeted now....

    Great article... And fuck the Jews and their sickness!

  3. Yes, but they have always smeared us as a bunch of raving anti-Semites. We have to carry on with our condemnation regardless. We don't fear the smear!

  4. Senator Charles F. Meachum: You got any plans after this? You have a rather unique skill set. I'd be interested in offering you a job.

    Bob Lee Swagger: Work? For you?

    Senator Charles F. Meachum: It's not really as bad as it seems. It's all gonna be done in any case. You might as well be on the side that gets you well paid for your efforts.

    Nick Memphis: And what side are you on?

    Senator Charles F. Meachum: There are no sides. There's no Sunnis and Shiites. There's no Democrats and Republicans. There's only HAVES and HAVE-NOTS.

  5. Running against a jew in an election is ‘anti-Semitic’

  6. Be Pro Semetic and help them. Suicide tips, The best Anti Freeze to drink, the best Fentanyl to inject, etc.


Fair Use Notice

This web site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance the understanding of humanity's problems and hopefully to help find solutions for those problems. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. A click on a hyperlink is a request for information. Consistent with this notice you are welcome to make 'fair use' of anything you find on this web site. However, if you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. You can read more about 'fair use' and US Copyright Law at the Legal Information Institute of Cornell Law School. This notice was modified from a similar notice at Information Clearing House.

Blog Archive