Saturday, February 24, 2018

The REAL NON-Biblical History of Jerusalem

Anyone want the real non biblical history of Jerusalem ?…the one agreed on by all creditable historians. Then follow the time line of Arabia in Thompson’s book below. It is the factual historical account acknowledged by all historians world wide. None of these dates or events or groups are disputed by any serious historian…..except of course by the Jewish myth makers.

# Jerusalem was not founded by Jews, i.e. adherents of the Jewish religion. It was founded between 3000 BCE and 2600 BCE by a West Semitic people or possibly the Canaanites, the common ancestors of Palestinians, Lebanese, many Syrians and Jordanians, and many Jews. But when it was founded Jews did not exist.

# Jerusalem was founded in honor of the ancient god Shalem. It does not mean City of Peace but rather ‘built-up place of Shalem.”

# The “Jewish people” were not building Jerusalem 3000 years ago, i.e. 1000 BCE. First of all, it is not clear when exactly Judaism as a religion centered on the worship of the one God took firm form. It appears to have been a late development since no evidence of worship of anything but ordinary Canaanite deities has been found in archeological sites through 1000 BCE. There was no invasion of geographical Palestine from Egypt by former slaves in the 1200s BCE. The pyramids had been built much earlier and had not used slave labor. The chronicle of the events of the reign of Ramses II on the wall in Luxor does not know about any major slave revolts or flights by same into the Sinai peninsula. Egyptian sources never heard of Moses or the 10 plagues & etc. Jews and Judaism emerged from a certain social class of Canaanites over a period of centuries inside Palestine.

# Jerusalem not only was not being built by the likely then non-existent “Jewish people” in 1000 BCE, but Jerusalem probably was not even inhabited at that point in history. Jerusalem appears to have been abandoned between 1000 BCE and 900 BCE, the traditional dates for the united kingdom under David and Solomon. So Jerusalem was not ‘the city of David,’ since there was no city when he is said to have lived. No sign of magnificent palaces or great states has been found in the archeology of this period, and the Assyrian tablets, which recorded even minor events throughout the Middle East, such as the actions of Arab queens, don’t know about any great kingdom of David and Solomon in geographical Palestine.

# Since archeology does not show the existence of a Jewish kingdom or kingdoms in the so-called First Temple Period, it is not clear when exactly the Jewish people would have ruled Jerusalem except for the Hasmonean Kingdom.
The Assyrians conquered Jerusalem in 722.
The Babylonians took it in 597 and ruled it until they were themselves conquered in 539 BCE by the Achaemenids of ancient Iran, who ruled Jerusalem until Alexander the Great took the Levant in the 330s BCE.
Alexander’s descendants, the Ptolemies ruled Jerusalem until 198 when Alexander’s other descendants, the Seleucids, took the city.
With the Maccabean Revolt in 168 BCE, the Jewish Hasmonean kingdom did rule Jerusalem until 37 BCE, though Antigonus II Mattathias, the last Hasmonean, only took over Jerusalem with the help of the Parthian dynasty in 40 BCE.
Herod ruled 37 BCE until the Romans conquered what they called Palestine in 6 CE (CE= ‘Common Era’ or what Christians call AD).
The Romans and then the Eastern Roman Empire of Byzantium ruled Jerusalem from 6 CE until 614 CE when the Iranian Sasanian Empire Conquered it, ruling until 629 CE when the Byzantines took it back.

#The Muslims conquered Jerusalem in 638 and ruled it until 1099 when the Crusaders conquered it.
The Crusaders killed or expelled Jews and Muslims from the city.
The Muslims under Saladin took it back in 1187 CE and allowed Jews to return, and Muslims ruled it until the end of World War I, or altogether for about 1192 years.

#Adherents of Judaism did not found Jerusalem. It existed for perhaps 2700 years before anything we might recognize as Judaism arose. Jewish rule may have been no longer than 170 years or so, i.e., the kingdom of the Hasmoneans.

# Therefore if historical building of Jerusalem and historical connection with Jerusalem establishes sovereignty over it as Netanyahu claims, here are the groups that have the greatest claim to the city:

A. The Muslims, who ruled it and built it over 1191 years.

B. The Egyptians, who ruled it as a vassal state for several hundred years in the second millennium BCE.

C. The Italians, who ruled it about 444 years until the fall of the Roman Empire in 450 CE.

D. The Iranians, who ruled it for 205 years under the Achaemenids, for three years under the Parthians (insofar as the last Hasmonean was actually their vassal), and for 15 years under the Sasanids.

E. The Greeks, who ruled it for over 160 years if we count the Ptolemys and Seleucids as Greek. If we count them as Egyptians and Syrians, that would increase the Egyptian claim and introduce a Syrian one.

F. The successor states to the Byzantines, which could be either Greece or Turkey, who ruled it 188 years, though if we consider the heir to be Greece and add in the time the Hellenistic Greek dynasties ruled it, that would give Greece nearly 350 years as ruler of Jerusalem.

G. There is an Iraqi claim to Jerusalem based on the Assyrian and Babylonian conquests, as well as perhaps the rule of the Ayyubids (Saladin’s dynasty), who were Kurds from Iraq.

Source, Thomas Thompson Jerusalem in Ancient History and Tradition
From an article comment at UNZ.Com in which another land thief cheerleader gets a history lesson.

The author, Thompson, has quite the resume:
Thomas L. Thompson (born January 7, 1939 in Detroit, Michigan) is a biblical scholar and theologian. He was professor of theology at the University of Copenhagen from 1993 to 2009, lives in Denmark and is now a Danish citizen.

Thompson was raised as a Catholic and obtained a B.A. from Duquesne University, in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, in 1962. After a year in Oxford, he moved to Tübingen, where he studied for twelve years with Kurt Galling and Herbert Haag.[2] In the meantime he was instructor in theology at Dayton University (1964–65) and Assistant Professor in Old Testament studies at the University of Detroit (1967–69). He then studied Catholic Theology at the University of Tübingen; his dissertation, "The Historicity of the Patriarchal Narratives: The Quest for the Historical Abraham", was completed in 1971 but rejected by the Catholic faculty (one of his examiners was Joseph Ratzinger, then Tübingen's Professor of Systematic Theology and later Pope Benedict XVI). Thompson then considered submitting his dissertation to the Protestant faculty, but left Tübingen in 1975 without a degree. The rejected dissertation was published in 1974 by De Gruyter Press.[3] The work, together with John Van Seters' Abraham in History and Tradition, became one of the pioneer works of Biblical minimalism.[2]

While teaching part-time at the University of North Carolina he was invited to finish his studies at Temple University in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, receiving his Ph.D.[clarification needed] in Old Testament Studies summa cum laude in 1976.[4][5]

The controversy around his dissertation prevented him from obtaining a position at a North American university.[6] He continued as a private scholar while working as a high school teacher, janitor and house painter until he was awarded a guest professorship at the École Biblique in Jerusalem in 1984. This appointment proved controversial among Israelis, who, according to Thompson, objected to his earlier study casting doubt on the historicity of the Jewish origin narratives. He then worked on a project on Palestinian place names for UNESCO, criticizing Israeli authorities for de-Arabicizing Palestinian place names. Accusations of antisemitism led to the project being closed.[4]

Thompson was named a National Endowment for the Humanities Fellow in 1988. He taught as visiting associate professor at Lawrence University (1988–89) and as associate professor at Marquette University (1989–1993), but did not receive tenure. In 1990, he met Danish theologian Niels Peter Lemche at a conference and in 1993 joined the faculty of the department of Theology at the University of Copenhagen as Professor in Old Testament exegesis. He retired and was granted emeritus status in 2009.
An educated man, very learned in his profession that dare question Jew Inc? Why, naturally, only an anti-Semite would do that!

Since Jews like to scream that their G-d gave them Israel and his/ her/its commandments must be followed, then what's their excuse for violating one of God's holy commandments, the one that says, "Thou Shalt not Kill?" It doesn't say, "Thou Shalt not Kill Jews, but Thou can Murder Muslims and Christians"

Or did their G-d give them an exemption to butcher hundreds of thousands of Palestinians, Syrians, Lebanese, Egyptians, Iraqis, Iranians, etc? Add in their False Flags, like the Israeli masterminded 9/11 attacks and the Israeli/Jew murder count goes into the tens of millions.

But I guess even asking that question makes me anti-Semitic?
The Star Of David Deception

This end times deception study will focus on the hexagram, which we’ve been told is the ‘Star of David‘, the universally recognized symbol of the state of Israel and the Jews.

The truth is that King David never used a star, so calling it the ‘Star of David‘ is a nice sounding name to cover what it really represents.

Satan hides the true meaning of his symbols behind counterfeit explanations.

To summarize, the six-pointed star is the supreme symbol of Satanic tyranny, which has been used by people throughout history to directly or indirectly worship Satan.
What's the Pope think about the Satanic aspect of the Star of David?


  1. Good post. I had read Ilana Mercer's article at Unz and thought it a pompous outflow of malarkey, and had noted also that a lot of the comments below the article seemed uninformed. Somehow missed the one on Thompson's book, though. Thanks for putting up a post on it.

  2. You nasty anti-semite, you, Greg !! HEE HEEEEEEEEEEE, nice job, Bro !!
    What's the expression ? . . . "In a Time of Universal Deceit — Telling the Truth Is a Revolutionary Act"
    Keep up the great work, and watch your back.

  3. Yes, of course, the Bible is not a history book, much less a title deed. Zio history and archaeology are entirely fraudulent.

    These are pics – worth all the words in all the cook books of the known Abraham mustard faiths - of the oldest known Russian icons painted by Russian orthodox Christian monks devoted to JC their Saviour.
    These icons are being whitewashed under the False guiding light of crypto Ashke-nazi jew Putain juif Putin. who tries to bark like a Russian orthodog whose boss is JC.
    And the whole world eats his talmud shit. I happen to be a few days in Paris. The new kid on the Elysee block is of course also a Rotschild dog.
    Sippin my Heineken waitin for the metro at Pere de la Chaise the RIP place of certain bones a thought passed:
    Pere De La Chaise / The fundamental question is / Where the hell is the Mayonaise….

    1. I'm with you on Putin, don't trust him because he's been in power too long. And he backed that DUMA bill to make asking questions about the holohoax a crime.

    2. @ Anonymo , Comrade In Arms please see the gj comment of a week ago at:

      And we cannot close our eyes to the large number of centuries old Black Madonnas worshipped all over Europe.

  5. G-d damn it Greg! You are nothing more than a filthy anti-Semite for telling the truth about the Yids and their lies!

    How dare you defy the chosen ones of Satan! You will be smited! Smited I tell you!



Please stick to the topic at hand. Anyone trying to hijack this blog with long, winding comments about other topics or spam will be booted.

Fair Use Notice

This web site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance the understanding of humanity's problems and hopefully to help find solutions for those problems. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. A click on a hyperlink is a request for information. Consistent with this notice you are welcome to make 'fair use' of anything you find on this web site. However, if you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. You can read more about 'fair use' and US Copyright Law at the Legal Information Institute of Cornell Law School. This notice was modified from a similar notice at Information Clearing House.

Blog Archive