Thursday, November 18, 2010



Molten metal seen pouring out from the north face (near north east corner) around floor 80 of the WTC2 South Tower on 9/11, timed at a few minutes before the total destruction of the building (around 9:57am)

"The steel was so hot from the jet fuel that, uh, it was literally steaming. Your boots would melt in certain areas. That's how hot it was. The steel was coming out red in certain areas for the first couple weeks, at least."

Michael Casale, Project Supt., Mazzocchi Wrecking in Modern Marvels Demolition segment on WTC Ground Zero

9/11: "Steel was coming out red"

It's our good buddies at NIST, AKA the 'National Institute for Shit Throwing'

Did investigators consider the possibility that an explosion caused or contributed to the collapse of WTC 7? 
Yes, this possibility was investigated carefully. NIST concluded that blast events inside the building did not occur and found no evidence supporting the existence of a blast event.

THREE Explosions After Plane Hit WTC

Footage shot September 11, 2001. Just amazing footage of these brave fire fighters, they try to explain 3 bombs going off while still dazed.

Only Hell has Fires that Burn Longer
Firefighters have extinguished almost all but the last remnants of underground fires that have burned at the World Trade Center site for more than three months since the Sept. 11 terrorist attack.
Battalion Chief Brian Dixon confirmed later Wednesday that the main bodies of fire have been extinguished, although he said small pockets or "hot spots" are still being discovered.

But Dixon noted a firetruck remains on standby at the site, and the department considers it an active fire scene.

The fires that began with the Sept. 11 attacks had been strong enough that firetrucks had to spray a nearly constant jet of water on them. At times, the flames slowed the work of clearing the site.

"You couldn't even begin to imagine how much water was pumped in there," said Tom Manley of the Uniformed Firefighters Association, the largest fire department union. "It was like you were creating a giant lake."
Source: CBS News
It was determined that 3 million gallons of water were hosed on site in the fire-fighting efforts between 9/11 and 9/21″… “In addition, there were 2 episodes of rain during the same 10 day period after the attack: on 9/14 and 9/20, totaling 0.9 million gallons of water per Bathtub area. Considering the neighboring area, one can take 1 million gallons from the rain. Therefore, a total of 4 million gallons of water percolated through the debris in the first 10 days and collected at the bottom of the Bathtub.”
Source PDF file: Article Submitted to the American Chemical Society National Meeting, Orlando, Florida in April 2002

FOUR MILLION GALLONS onto the WTC wreckage, in the first 10 days after 9/11. All of that water would've diluted any remaining jet and diesel fuel, and the gasoline that was in the vehicles in the WTC parking areas. Due to the vehicles getting crushed ,the fuel would've spilled out, then diluted by all that water to the point it would no longer be flammable.

So for a fire to be burning THREE MONTHS later, after millions and millions of gallons of water being used,
shows without a doubt that there was some kind of chemical agent used in the WTC attack that was resistant to water.


'Lucky' Larry not the only one to be 'lucky' on 9/11
President Bush's cousin, Jim Pierce, managing director of the AON Corporation, an insurance company with offices in WTC 2. He had arranged a business conference, to be held on the tower’s 105th floor this morning. However, the previous night, the conference was moved to the Millennium Hotel.
Another 'miracle,' this time at the Pentagon!

Between 9:03 a.m. and 9:37 a.m. September 11, 2001, NBC News correspondent Jim Miklaszewski is heading down a hall inside the Pentagon when he runs into a Defense Department official who tells him "We're Next," and to stay away from the E-ring, the outermost corridor of the Pentagon.

"The Missing Jolt: A Simple Refutation of the NIST-Bazant Collapse Hypothesis"by Prof. Graeme MacQueen and Tony Szamboti.

This fine paper underwent several months of rather arduous peer-review preceding its publication in the Journal of 9/11 Studies. The paper supports work by James Gourley published in the Journal of Engineering Mechanics and recent analysis by David Chandler. A few quotes from the paper should wet your interest:

"In its Final Report on the Collapse of the World Trade Center Towers, the National Institute of Standards and Technology summarizes its three year study and outlines its explanation of the total collapse of WTC 1 and WTC 2.[1] Readers of the report will find that the roughly $20 million expended on this effort have resulted in an explanation of the total collapse of these buildings that is so vague it barely qualifies as a hypothesis. But it does have one crucial feature of a hypothesis: it is, in principle, falsifiable. In fact, it is easy to demonstrate that it is false.
What a Gravity-Driven Demolition Looks Like


  1. This is some of the most damning evidence not addressed by NIST.

    I used to work with people from NIST by phone, email and in person for years. For a long time I had the utmost respect for their technical knowledge base. Then in the late 90's congress mandated NIST to administer a very flawed law the 'fastener quality act' to the industry. It was a political football tossed around with special interests, including some sister companies, trying to control the outcome. NIST drug it out for years to maintain their newly created jobs until the insanity was so obvious the law was gutted as it should have been. Millions of dollars were spent in
    the fiasco. NIST claimed victory.

    So it came as no surprise they would sell out in the 9/11 'investigation.' It was go along with the cover up or lose their jobs ... or worse.

  2. Hey Greg:

    I was inquiring if you were interested in a copy of a book, pdf version, if you are uncomfortable with e-mail here is the title of the book. Perhaps you can find it on line:

    Forward Introduction Chapter 1 -
    Three enemies of Judaism.
    Chapter 2 -
    How rescue was impeded by Nathan Schwalb and YItzchak Greenbaum of the Jewish Agency.
    Chapter 3 -
    The crimes of Abba Kovner of Mapam and Chalm Weizmann.

    Chapter 4 —
    How our people starved because of Stephen Wise of the American Jewish Congress.
    Chapter 5 -
    Zionist betrayal resulting in tragic deaths on land and sea.
    Chapter 6 ~
    The unique obstructionist role of Sail f\Aayer of the Joint Distribution Committee.

    Chapter 7 -
    What Henry !\Aontor of the United Jewish Appeal and other Zionist officials were doing while our people died.
    Chapter 8 ~
    The Romanian Jews and thwarted rescue plans.
    Chapter 9 -
    The shameful role of Mordecai Ehrenprelsz in Sweden.

    Chapter 10 -
    Fifth columnists in the ghettoes: Merin and Moldetsky.

    The non-zionist jews used to know what the zionists had done, how they had sacrificed the ordinary follower of judaism.
    How they left them to die, because Israel was the goal.
    This history is forgotten.

    Of course consider the transfer agreement.
    I touched on it in this post
    "During the first months of the Hitler regime, leaders of the Zionist movement concluded a controversial pact with the Third Reich which, in its various forms, transferred some 60,000 Jews and $100 million---to Jewish Palestine. In return, Zionists would halt the worldwide Jewish-led anti-nazi boycott that threatened to topple the Hitler regime in its first year. Ultimately, the Transfer Agreement saved lives, rescued assets, and seeded the infrastructure of the Jewish State to be."

    So, thanks to Hitler, Israel exists? The Ultimate Zionist achievement?

    What is not mentioned is the so called transfer agreement hung a lot of followers of Judaism out to dry.

    Anyway, see if you can find the book, it will give you a different perspective. Makes you realize how little we, as a group, know about history, and how it has been sanitized and alter to benefit the powerful

  3. When I was in basic in the Army, we got shown the M14 incendiary device, which was designed to disable a vehicle by melting thru an engine block. It uses thermite.
    These have been around for a long time. I have seen the aftermath of a car engine on which an M14 has been used - it is not pretty.

    The M14

    A cylindrical grenade visually identical to the M8, the M14 (also written AN/M14) is a purpose designed incendiary grenade. Working off the intense and violent reaction of the thermite filler, end result of the detonation of the M14 is molten iron. This means the M14 is primarily employed on material to be destroyed in a roughly secure environment and not as an offensive or defensive weapon. The grenade has the ability to melt right through an engine block. Also, since the thermite reaction uses iron oxide instead of oxygen for its oxidizing agent, the grenade can work under water.

    Video on linear thermite cutting charges:

    You can also find videos titled incendiary grenade or thermite grenade.

  4. more

  5. Thanks to all for the tips and I'll look into that book, Penny.


Please stick to the topic at hand. Anyone trying to hijack this blog with long, winding comments about other topics or spam will be booted.

Fair Use Notice

This web site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance the understanding of humanity's problems and hopefully to help find solutions for those problems. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. A click on a hyperlink is a request for information. Consistent with this notice you are welcome to make 'fair use' of anything you find on this web site. However, if you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. You can read more about 'fair use' and US Copyright Law at the Legal Information Institute of Cornell Law School. This notice was modified from a similar notice at Information Clearing House.

Blog Archive