Thursday, February 3, 2011

9/11 Pentagon Flight 77--What's Wrong with These Pictures?

FBI says this picture shows the 757 hitting the Pentagon. Don't you see it? It's clear as MUD. Try clicking your ruby slippers together three times!

Enver Masud: Pentagon Transcripts, Official Records Belie ‘The 9/11 Commission Report’

I live less than a mile from the Pentagon, and began examining this issue in early 2002. The first question I asked when I looked at the Pentagon shortly after that tragic day in 2001 was, “where’s the plane?”

I began to suspect the official account of 9/11 when I learned that the U.S. war on Afghanistan was apparently planned prior to September 11, and possibly after U.S. negotiations with the Taliban for a pipeline broke down... and that military action against Afghanistan would go ahead by the middle of October [2001].

On September 12, 2001, news media had to have known that something was amiss when at the Dept. of Defense News Briefing “American Airlines”, “Flight 77″, “Boeing 757″, were not even mentioned, and reporters were being “threatened or, in fact, handcuffed and dragged away”.

September 11, 2001: CNN News Report

Just minutes after the alleged attack, standing in front of the Pentagon on September 11, 2001, Jamie McIntyre, CNN’s senior Pentagon correspondent since November 1992, reported: “From my close up inspection there’s no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the Pentagon. . . . . The only pieces left that you can see are small enough that you could pick up in your hand. There are no large tail sections, wing sections, fuselage — nothing like that anywhere around which would indicate that the entire plane crashed into the side of the Pentagon."
Maybe a 'mini-me' version of the 757 hit the Pentagon?


The transcript is as follows:

"From my close-up inspection, there's no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the Pentagon.

"The only site, is the actual side of the building that's crashed in, and as I said, the only pieces left that you can see are small enough that you pick up in your hand.

Jamie McIntyre, CNN’s senior Pentagon correspondent

What? You Mean our the leaders of our 'democratic republic' would LIE to 'We the People?'

President George W. Bush and seven of his administration's top officials, including Vice President Dick Cheney, National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice, and Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, made at least 935 false statements in the two years following September 11, 2001, about the national security threat posed by Saddam Hussein's Iraq.

Source: Project for Public Integrity

Which Brings Us to Some Rather Peculiar Incidents Surrounding the 9/11 Pentagon Attack

What really smashed into the Pentagon on 9/11? Let's look at what we've been told (lied to?) hit the Pentagon, a Boeing 757.

The Boeing 757 has two different types of engines, depending on the model and year made.

One was the Rolls-Royce RB211 high-bypass turbofan engines, and its fan diameter varied from 73.2 " to 74.1" & its length varies from 117.9" to 118.5", depending on the year made and model.

Picture of an intact Rolls-Royce RB211 Jet Engine


Another engine the 757 used was the Pratt & Whitney PW2000 high-bypass turbofan aero engines, and its diameter was 78.5 inches & its length, flange to flange: 141.4 inches.

Picture of an intact Pratt & Whitney PW2000 Jet Engine


Picture of the engine from the craft that hit the Pentagon. All that heat must of 'shrunk' the engine? Maybe we should get the NIST to investigate?


Another 9/11 Miracle as the engine seems to have shrunk from being SIX FOOT TALL to being only about TWO FOOT TALL. It's a miracle, I tell you!!

More food for thought:

Here's the 'official' story on who piloted the object that crashed into the Pentagon.
Hani Hanjour, one of the hijackers who was trained as a pilot, assumed control of the flight.
Except that 'Hani' couldn't even learn how to fly one of the world's easiest planes to fly, a single-engine Cessna, but was able to master the control of one of the world's largest and most sophisticated craft, the Boeing 757?
In late 1996, hijacker Hani Hanjour attends CRM Airline Training Center in Scottsdale, Arizona for three months. This is normally adequate time to earn a private pilot’s certificate, but Hanjour fails to accomplish this. [Los Angeles Times, 9/27/2001] Duncan Hastie, the school’s owner, finds Hanjour a “weak student” who is “wasting our resources.” According to Hastie, “He was not able to fly solo in a small plane, which is equivalent to getting out of a parking space [in a car] and stopping.”

At the next flight school Hanjour will attend in early 2001, the staff will be so appalled at his lack of skills that they will repeatedly contact the FAA and ask them to investigate how he got a pilot’s license (see January-February 2001). After 9/11, the FBI will appear to investigate how Hanjour got his license and question and polygraph the instructor who signed off on his flying skills. The Washington Post will note that, since Hanjour’s pilot skills were so bad, the issue of how he was able to get a license “remains a lingering question that FAA officials refuse to discuss.” [Washington Post, 10/15/2001; CBS News, 5/10/2002]
Source: History Commons

Another 9/11 Miracle! 200,000 pounds of Boeing debris virtually vanished, but a driver's license survived the crash, explosion and 2,000 degree fire!!
In all, the plane took eight-tenths of a second to fully penetrate 310 feet into the three outermost rings and unleashed a fireball that rose 200 feet above the building.

Investigators also found a part of Nawaf al-Hazmi's driver's license in the North Parking Lot rubble pile.

CBS News reported that "Preliminary information shows there is nothing that appears to be useful on the cockpit voice tape. The tape appears to be blank or erased."
Source: 'Ziopedia'

Did they check the recorder for fingerprints?

If you want to hear from some ROCKET SCIENTISTS trying to back up the 9/11 'Omission Commission' Pentagon story, then this site is for you.

But they don't explain how one of the hardest metals known, titanium, could 'evaporate' from the crash site, but a driver's license could survive and be found by 'investigators.'

I wish they'd explain how a Boeing 757, constructed of mostly aluminum alloy and carbon fiber composite, could smash thru 310' of reinforced concrete and steel at the Pentagon.

Carbon fiber is strong, stiff and light, but once the ultimate strength of the material is exceeded, carbon fiber will fail suddenly and catastrophically.

Try smashing an empty beer can against some concrete and see what happens. Be careful not to break any bones when the can flattens out like a pancake, leaving the concrete unmarked and intact.

Guess they also forgot to mention that the 757 produces a dangerous amount of wake turbulence. Wake turbulence is turbulence that forms behind an aircraft as it passes through the air.

And that wake turbulence is especially hazardous during the landing and take off phases of flight, making the flying of the 757 close to the ground damn near impossible.

Nor do they talk about this 'inconvenient truth,' that a majority of the 9/11 Commission members now reject their own report.
In John Farmer’s book: “The Ground Truth: The Story Behind America’s Defense on 9/11″, the author builds the inescapably convincing case that the official version... is almost entirely untrue...

The 9/11 Commission now tells us that the official version of 9/11 was based on false testimony and documents and is almost entirely untrue. The details of this massive cover-up are carefully outlined in a book by John Farmer, who was the Senior Counsel for the 9/11 Commission.

Farmer, Dean of Rutger Universities' School of Law and former Attorney General of New Jersey, was responsible for drafting the original flawed 9/11 report.

Does Farmer have cooperation and agreement from other members of the Commission? Yes. Did they say Bush ordered 9/11? No. Do they say that the 9/11 Commission was lied to by the FBI, CIA, Whitehouse and NORAD? Yes. Is there full documentary proof of this? Yes.

Farmer states...“at some level of the government, at some point in time…there was an agreement not to tell the truth about what happened... I was shocked at how different the truth was from the way it was described …. The [Norad air defense] tapes told a radically different story from what had been told to us and the public for two years. This is not spin.”

In 2006, The Washington Post reported..."Suspicion of wrongdoing ran so deep that the 10-member commission, in a secret meeting at the end of its tenure in summer 2004, debated referring the matter to the Justice Department for criminal investigation, according to several commission sources. Staff members and some commissioners thought that e-mails and other evidence provided enough probable cause to believe that military and aviation officials violated the law by making false statements to Congress and to the commission..."
Missing Pentagon Evidence: The Suppression of Decisive Pentagon Attack Evidence

Columns of people in FBI jackets walked portions of the Pentagon lawn and adjacent roads shortly after the attack, apparently to pick up crash debris. The photographs and videos of these activities do not suggest any attempt to carefully note and record the positions of any debris they may have been finding.
9/11 was a FALSE FLAG/INSIDE JOB pulled off by the WH, elements of the CIA and FBI, and Israel.

It gave the USA the excuse needed to 'Shock and Awe" those nations Israel didn't like, which is pretty much every Arab/Muslim country in the ME & SW Asia.

It also provided cover for those 'Too Big to JAIL' Zionist owned, Jewish run Wall Street banks to steal TRILLIONS from America, in broad daylight, since we were scared to death of 'al CIA duh' boogiemen being broadcast non-stop by the Zionist MSM.
Pentagon employee April Gallop, whose "desk was roughly 40 feet from the point where the plane allegedly hit the outside wall" stated in a sworn complaint (before the U.S. District Court Southern District of New York): "As she sat down to work there was an explosion, then another; walls collapsed and the ceiling fell in. Hit in the head, she was able to grab the baby and make her way towards the daylight showing through a blasted opening in the outside wall. There was no airplane wreckage and no burning airplane fuel anywhere; only rubble and dust."
Clip from the 1996 movie "Executive Decision" containing elements of 9/11

The same 'Tribe' that owns Hollywood had their Khazarian Comrades help pull off the FALSE FLAG/INSIDE JOB of 9/11.


Peter of Lone Tree said...

Evidence That a Frozen Fish Didn't Impact the Pentagon on 9/11
and Neither Did a Boeing 757

by Joe Quinn

buelahman said...

David Chandler recently added the following video to a post seemingly suggesting that an airplane would disintegrate upon impact:

Greg Bacon said...

David Chandler recently added the following video to a post seemingly suggesting that an airplane would disintegrate upon impact

Disintegrate? Maybe, but not evaporate, or was it another Shanksville, PA 9/11 miracle, where we were told the ground 'liquified' and swallowed up an entire passenger jet?

I might be bit ignorant and a wee bit gullible, but I'm not that fucking stupid.

John Friend said...

Barbara Honegger spoke at the past San Diegans for 9/11 Truth meeting to discuss The Pentagon Attack Papers, in which she documented pretty conclusively that bombs were placed in the Pentagon (much like Oklahoma City!). I'm trying to figure out how the Mossad was able to rig the Pentagon in addition to the WTC!!

Fair Use Notice

This web site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance the understanding of humanity's problems and hopefully to help find solutions for those problems. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. A click on a hyperlink is a request for information. Consistent with this notice you are welcome to make 'fair use' of anything you find on this web site. However, if you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. You can read more about 'fair use' and US Copyright Law at the Legal Information Institute of Cornell Law School. This notice was modified from a similar notice at Information Clearing House.

Blog Archive