Monday, June 29, 2015

Why Won't Emory University's Holocaust Studies Program Answer My Simple Questions?

The questions are easy to understand and would be easy to answer, especially since Emory University (EU) has the "Holocaust Denial on Trial" center, where they claim; "Holocaust Denial on Trial: Using History to Confront Distortions."

So, give me some history EU and please answer these simple questions. Been waiting for four weeks, but am guessing an actual answer will never be forthcoming, since LIES are difficult to defend.

This government supported propaganda outlet is run by Deborah Lipstadt, Emory professor of Jewish and Holocaust studies. Lipstadt is the Jew's 'Donna Quixote,' always railing against those who would seek the truth, even seeking to toss them in prison for merely asking questions about history.

She has a blog, but it's outdated. But she still writes mind-numbing slop for the NYT, trying to conjure up the anti-Semitic 'boogieman' for readers to shiver at the mention.

Lipstadt is famous infamous for her 2000 trial with Holocaust truth searcher David Irving, which she 'won,' but it's hard to win a trial when the judge imposes a 'gag' rule on the plaintiff, David Irving. Here's what Norman Finklestein said about the trial:
Norman G. Finkelstein openly criticized Lipstadt for her role in the Irving trial, stating "Her [Lipstadt] lawyers imposed a gag rule on Deborah Lipstadt during her trial with David Irving - she was banned not only from testifying in court but also speaking to the press - because they knew full well that a single word from this know-nothing's mouth would sink the ship. In her account of the trial Lipstadt can barely conceal the lawyer's contempt for her, yet she is too thick-headed to notice the absurdity of her smug two thumbs-up after the jury announced its verdict. She had as much to do with the victory as I [Finkelstein] did with last night's performance of the Bolshoi."
Even Judge Gray, who presided over this kangaroo court, had his doubts about the greatest con of the 20th Century, if not history:
". . . the contemporaneous documents, such as drawings, plans, correspondence with contractors and the like, yield little clear evidence of the existence of gas chambers designed to kill humans. Such isolated references to the use of gas as are to be found amongst these documents can be explained by the need to fumigate clothes so as to reduce the incidence of diseases such as typhus."

“The Defendants recognise that not all of the evidence which I have sought to summarise above is altogether reliable," wrote Judge Gray. "This applies with particular force to the evidence of the eye-witnesses.”
Lipstadt says the people who don't or refuse to worship at the Holocaust altar are guilty of 'soft-core' denial of the Holocaust hoax. Guess most Americans are soft-core deniers, but the Holocausters keep trying mightily to imprint this fraud into our heads.

For an excellent blog detailing the nefarious dealings of Ms Lipstadt, click here.

Now my email to EU's Holocaust™ Monetary Support Unit.
The George Stevens documentary, “Nazi Concentration Camps 1945, shows lampshades made from the skin of dead Jews and the alleged Jewish shrunken heads.
It also shows 'shower heads' at Dachau that were in the ceiling and NO wire cages existed in the reel.

Since Zyklon B is cyanide and cyanide is lighter than air, meaning it would float to the ceiling, how did the Germans get the gas to drop down?

And what is you opinion on the Jewish shrunken heads and lamp shades made from Jewish skin?

And where are the huge piles of the large human body bones, which are left over after cremation?

As for Auschwitz, for decades, people were told that 4 million, most of them Jews, were killed at Auschwitz, until the 'Iron Curtain' fell and research was allowed in Russia and then the number dropped to 2.5 million.

Then the number dropped again, to a little over one million, mostly Jews, yet we keep hearing the 'six million died' meme about the holocaust.

How do you reconcile that huge discrepancy or do you?

And what do you think about the grandchildren of holocaust survivors now clamoring for some kind of restitution?

And what are your thoughts about the phony holocaust narratives told by liars like " Misha: A Mémoire of the Holocaust Years?"

One more: I've read some of your thoughts on the holocaust at this site and you claim that when the Germans ran out of coke to burn the Jewish corpses, they used wood, which was plentiful, to burn in the ovens/piles.
Did they get that wood from nearby forests? Because if they did, firewood has to 'cure' for at least four months or more, preferably a year, so it can dry out and burn properly, right? So did the Germans start cutting down trees and stacking the firewood to cure long before they ran out of coke?

And do you have pics taken on the ground or by recon planes that shows huge swaths of the nearby woods cut down?

Thanks so much!
If you want to ask the slippery Lipstadt some questions, here's some that will make her head spin!


  1. Zionists can never back up their lies. They say things with no evidence. Knowing that it is essential to continuously ask the questions. Silence or irrational answers are exposure.

  2. Someone there acknowledged my email and said they'd get back, but that's the only reply received.

    Got an even better expose coming, based on the magnificent "The Hoax of the Twentieth Century' by Arthur Butz.

  3. I would love an answer to each and every one of your questions! But that would be too good...


Fair Use Notice

This web site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance the understanding of humanity's problems and hopefully to help find solutions for those problems. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. A click on a hyperlink is a request for information. Consistent with this notice you are welcome to make 'fair use' of anything you find on this web site. However, if you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. You can read more about 'fair use' and US Copyright Law at the Legal Information Institute of Cornell Law School. This notice was modified from a similar notice at Information Clearing House.

Blog Archive