Thursday, March 9, 2017

FAKEBOOK Allows Child Pornography, But is Against Truth?

What 'ya looking at, Markie?

What is Mark ZUCKERBERG up to? Giving in to DNA urgings or just making easy money by exploiting the most vulnerable in society?
Facebook failed to remove sexualised images of children

Facebook has been criticised for its handling of reports about sexualised images of children on its platform. The chairman of the Commons media committee, Damian Collins, said he had "grave doubts" about the effectiveness of its content moderation systems.

Mr Collins' comments come after the BBC reported dozens of photos to Facebook, but more than 80% were not removed. They included images from groups where users were discussing swapping what appeared to be child abuse material.

When provided with examples of the images, Facebook reported the BBC journalists involved to the police and cancelled plans for an interview. It subsequently issued a statement: "It is against the law for anyone to distribute images of child exploitation."

The US firm says it has improved this system since an investigation by the BBC last year. That found "secret" groups were being used by paedophiles to meet and swap images.

Information the BBC provided to the police led to one man being sent to prison for four years.

To test Facebook's claim, the BBC used the report button to alert the company to 100 images which appeared to break its guidelines. They included:
pages explicitly for men with a sexual interest in children
images of under-16s in highly sexualised poses, with obscene comments posted beside them
groups with names such as "hot xxxx schoolgirls" containing stolen images of real children
an image that appeared to be a still from a video of child abuse, with a request below it to share "child pornography"
Of the 100 images only 18 were removed.

According to Facebook's automated replies, the other 82 did not breach "community standards". They included the apparent freeze frame.

Facebook's rules forbid convicted sex offenders from having accounts. But the BBC found five convicted paedophiles with profiles, and reported them to Facebook via its own system. None of them were taken down.

The National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children (NSPCC) also voiced concern.

"Facebook's failure to remove illegal content from its website is appalling and violates the agreements they have in place to protect children," said a spokeswoman.

"It also raises the question of what content they consider to be inappropriate and dangerous to children."
This sickness has been going on FAKEBOOK for at least seven years, yet they're still giving pedophiles a platform while taking down those sites that don't repeat the MSM lies or like their independence?

What is ZUCKERBERG's end game? Now we know why FAKEBOOK breaks the law by allowing minors to sign up; so the pedophiles will have more kids to ensnare.

Watch the future Wiki leaks show FAKEBOOK and Google part of the CIA.

What should be done to male pedophiles is to nail their nuts to a tree stump, then give them a straight razor and walk away. They can either chop off you know what or slit their throat.

1 comment:

Fair Use Notice

This web site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance the understanding of humanity's problems and hopefully to help find solutions for those problems. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. A click on a hyperlink is a request for information. Consistent with this notice you are welcome to make 'fair use' of anything you find on this web site. However, if you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. You can read more about 'fair use' and US Copyright Law at the Legal Information Institute of Cornell Law School. This notice was modified from a similar notice at Information Clearing House.

Blog Archive