Tuesday, June 19, 2018

Why do Jew Democrats get a Pass on Child Pornography?

The sicko is Jacob Schwartz, a former? aide to New York City Mayor Bill De Blasio, who was caught with a MASSIVE stash of kiddie porn over one year ago. Where's the perv at? Can't find any recent info on the little bastard, making me suspicious that he probably got off with being sent to some cozy country club like place to cure his disease, then released.
Jacob Schwartz, 29, was busted for allegedly keeping more than 3,000 disgusting images and 89 videos on a laptop after downloading the filth from the internet. The illegal smut shows “young nude females between the approximate ages of 6 months and 16, engaging in sexual conduct… on an adult male,” court papers say.
Schwartz’ father — labor lawyer and Democratic insider Arthur Schwartz — called his son’s case “a personal tragedy.” “I understand these are serious charges,” said the elder Schwartz, who watched his son get arraigned in Manhattan Criminal Court on Thursday night.

“He’s already in therapy for this.”

Jacob Schwartz was charged with promoting a sexual performance by a child and possessing a sexual performance by a child under 16, both felonies, and released on $7,500 bail. [Including the video tape rape of a 6 month old baby. Where in the hell do people get sick shit like that? From their mohel Rabbi?]
A personal tragedy? Only tragic because a Chosen One was caught, not that he was engaging in sickening twisted behavior, which seems to run thick in Jew blood. Therapy? He should be in prison, finding out what it's like to have predators prey on the weak.
$7,500 bail? That's a joke.

My guess is he's already out of therapy and working on getting that stash of nude babies back up.

Maybe Yacob flew 'Air Aliyah' to Israel, where many (((pedos))) flee to avoid arrest by those nasty GOYIM who are just meanies, always fucking with Tribe members because they're anti-Semitic!

Or maybe it's some kind of DNA defect?
Jews are Prominent in Pedophile Bust

Looks like Jacob has some influential friends!


  1. Sick filthy immoral rat bastards ! They think if they post such garbage text about how it's not such a bad thing to be a pedo, that Americans will suck it up, be sympathetic, maybe even engage themselves ????
    ARE YOU JOKING ??????????
    You sick psychotic rotten scum ; GET THE HELL OUT OF AMERICA, NOW !!!!!!!!!!!!
    WE HATE YOU !!

  2. Even if I found out that pedophiles were "born that way", I'd have zero tolerance. In fact, I'd be more likely to say that maybe we should reconsider eugenics and execute the pedophiles and sterilize the immediate family members just so that this "trait" doesn't get passed down. Extreme? Yes. But pedophilia simply cannot be tolerated by any decent society. The moment that pedophilia becomes okay -- even just a little bit -- is the moment that the cancer of immorality becomes incurable and it will surely kill the host. And if the "laws" are immoral, they cease to become laws that we are bound to obey.

    Right now, I believe that it is a cycle of abuse. Pedophiles are created when you molest kids. Some kids end up becoming the abuser when they grow up. If you can stop the cycle of abuse, you'll cut down the amount of pedophiles in the world. That makes it less ethical to kill them all as a solution. If they really want to go down this road, it may become necessary for parents of the victims to stop relying on the justice system and to just take care of the problem themselves. Don't report it. Just take care of it.
    Normally I'm not for vigilante justice, but if those in power decide to use "science" as an excuse to let pedos off, then we'll have no choice but to enforce the moral law in order to protect kids. At least the playing field would be leveled as all those rich or (((connected)))) pedos couldn't buy their way out of trouble if it were someone like me delivering the verdict.


Please stick to the topic at hand. Anyone trying to hijack this blog with long, winding comments about other topics or spam will be booted.

Fair Use Notice

This web site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance the understanding of humanity's problems and hopefully to help find solutions for those problems. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. A click on a hyperlink is a request for information. Consistent with this notice you are welcome to make 'fair use' of anything you find on this web site. However, if you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. You can read more about 'fair use' and US Copyright Law at the Legal Information Institute of Cornell Law School. This notice was modified from a similar notice at Information Clearing House.

Blog Archive